SAT0411 Investigations for the diagnosis of septic arthritis in the acute setting. results from a single tertiary centre over 5 years. (12th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shamdasani, P.; Liew, D.; McMaster, C.; Foote, A.; Hardidge, A.; Buchanan, R.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 77(2018)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 1066
• Page End: 1067
• Publication Date: 2018-06-12
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.1806
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Septic arthritis is a rheumatologic emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality 1 . Timely and accurate diagnosis in the emergency department is essential for early medical and surgical involvement. Objectives: To examine the predictive value of investigations used to diagnose septic arthritis in the acute setting. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients referred from the emergency department to the orthopaedic surgery service with a potential diagnosis of septic arthritis between June 2010 and December 2015 at the Austin Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data was collected regarding demographic details, risk factors, pathology results, antibiotic prescribing, joint aspirate and theatre samples. Results: The study included 126 patients with 132 emergency department presentations involving 141 joints. The median age of patients was 70 (IQR 52.3–79.8); 86 (68.3%) were male. The most common joints involved were the knee (49.6%) and hip (17.7%). In 88 of the 132 presentations (67%), culture of the synovial fluid was positive. 19 of these 88 (22%) culture positive presentations had no classical risk factors for septic arthritis (joint prosthesis, previous septic arthritis, immunosuppressed, previous joint disease, intravenous drug use). 12 of the 88 (13%) culture positive patients had symptoms for longer than 4 weeks on presentation in contrast to 2 of the 44 (5%) in culture negative group. There were 8 presentations with multiple joints involved. None of these presentations were in the culture positive group. There was no evidence of a relationship between WCC and culture status (p=0.56) or CRP and culture status (p=0.64), either singly or when combined. There were 94 joint aspirations performed in 132 presentations. 30 (32%) joint aspirations required ultrasound guidance. 42 (45%) joint aspirations had antibiotics administered prior to sample collection. In the culture positive presentations 25 (28.4%) did not have a joint aspirate performed prior to surgical washout. Crystals were seen in 19 (30.2%) culture positive patients. 26 (29.5%) culture positive presentations had no growth on aspirate culture but had positive theatre cultures. Conclusions: While septic arthritis is a common emergency presentation, there are few useful non-invasive diagnostic tests. Although risk factors aid in stratifying risk, duration of symptoms and inflammatory markers are poor differentiators. Neither the presence of crystals nor the absence of growth on aspirate culture exclude septic arthritis. Reference: [1] Gupta M, Sturrock R, Field M. A prospective 2-year study of 75 patients with adult-onset septic arthritis. Rheumatology2001(40):24–30. Disclosure of Interest: None declared