Density calibrated cone beam CT as a tool for adaptive radiotherapy. (3rd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Holm, Anne I. S.; Nyeng, Tine B.; S. Møller, Ditte; Assenholt, Marianne S.; Hansen, Rune; Nyvang, Lars; Ravkilde, Thomas; Thomsen, Mette S.; Hoffmann, Lone
• Is Part Of: Acta oncologica. Volume 60:Number 10(2021)
• Page Start: 1275
• Page End: 1282
• Publication Date: 2021-10-03
• Subjects: CBCT -- dose calibration -- adaptive radiotherapy; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Treatment -- Periodicals; 616.992
• DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1945678
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0284-186X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Visual inspections of anatomical changes observed on daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) images are often used as triggers for radiotherapy plan adaptation to avoid unacceptable dose levels to the target or OARs. Direct CBCT dose calculations would improve the ability to adapt only those plans where dosimetric changes are observed. This study investigates the accuracy of dose calculations on CBCTs. Materials and methods: Calibration curves were obtained for CBCT imagers at nine identical accelerators. CBCT scans of a phantom with different density inserts were recorded for two scan modes (Head-Neck and Pelvis) and mean calibration curves were calculated. Subsequently, CBCT scans of the phantom with six different density inserts were recorded, the dose distributions on the CBCTs were calculated and compared to dose on the planning CT (pCT). The uncertainty was quantified by the dosimetric difference between the pCT and the CBCT. The two mean calibration curves were used to calculate the daily delivered CBCT dose for ten Head-Neck-, eleven Lung-, and ten pelvic patients. Additional patient calculations were performed using low-HU empirically corrected calibration curves. Patient doses were compared on target coverage and mean dose, and D1cc for OARs. Results: The dose differences between pCT and CBCT for phantom data were small for all DVH parameters, with mean deviations below ±0.6% for both CBCT modes. For patient data, it was found that low-HU corrected calibration curves performed the best. The mean deviations for the mean dose and coverage of the target were 0.2%±0.7% and 0.1%±0.6%, across all patient groups. Conclusion: Dose calculation on CBCT images results in target coverage and mean dose with an accuracy of the order of 1%, which makes this acceptable for clinical use. The CBCT mode specific calibration curves can be used at all identical imaging devices and for all patient groups.