The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation. Issue 10 (17th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tontini, Gian E; Prada, Alberto; Sferrazza, Sandro; Ciprandi, Giorgio; Vecchi, Maurizio
• Is Part Of: JGH open. Volume 5:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 1135
• Page End: 1141
• Publication Date: 2021-09-17
• Subjects: bowel preparation -- colonoscopy -- patient satisfaction
• DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12653
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2397-9070

Abstract

Abstract: Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characteristics, and bowel preparation (BP). The adequacy of bowel cleansing is critical, but, unfortunately, may be inadequate in up to one‐third of procedures. The current article will present and discuss the main BPs and their drawbacks, which include patient‐dependent and procedure‐dependent factors. Cleansing quality depends on the ease/complexity of solution preparation, volume, taste, and timing of consumption. Consequently, important positive factors include simple instructions, easy preparation of the solution, low volume, pleasant taste, short drinking time (e.g. <30 min), and splitting the dose between the evening before and the morning of the colonoscopy (or even better, only one dose in the early morning to avoid night‐time problems), and short onset of action. The BP solution must also be safe with negligible side effects. Furthermore, a positive experience supports patient willingness to repeat the procedure. Abstract : The present bowel preparations (BPs) present a series of drawbacks. The ideal BP should be effective, safe, easily self‐administered, have good patient acceptance, and be low cost.