Patients use an internet technology to report when things go wrong. Issue 3 (1st June 2007)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wasson, John H; MacKenzie, Todd A; Hall, Michael
• Is Part Of: Quality & safety in health care. Volume 16:Issue 3(2007)
• Page Start: 213
• Page End: 215
• Publication Date: 2007-06-01
• DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019810
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-3898

Abstract

Abstract : Background: As patients directly experience harm from adverse events, investigators have proposed patient-report to complement professional reporting of adverse events. Objective: To investigate how an automated health assessment system can be used to identify adverse events. Design and setting: Internet survey responses from April 2003 to April 2005 involving communities and clinical practices across the USA. Patients: 44 860 adults aged 19–69 years. Outcome: Patient perceptions of adverse events experienced during the previous year. Independent legal review was also used to estimate how many patient-reports were serious enough to be potentially compensable. Results: Although patient reports of possible adverse events was low (1.4%), the percentage of adverse events was eight times higher for patients with the greatest burden of illness than for those with the least (3.4% vs 0.4%). Two expert malpractice attorneys agreed that 9% of the adverse events seemed to be serious. Conclusions: Patients will use internet technology to report their perceptions of health-related adverse events. Some of the patient-reported events reported will be serious.