Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for albumin-to-creatinine ratio and albuminuria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 11 (November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for albumin-to-creatinine ratio and albuminuria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 11 (November 2021)
- Main Title:
- Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for albumin-to-creatinine ratio and albuminuria: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Mejia, Jhonatan R.
Fernandez-Chinguel, Jose Ernesto
Dolores-Maldonado, Gandy
Becerra-Chauca, Naysha
Goicochea-Lugo, Sergio
Herrera-Añazco, Percy
Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The accuracy of urine dipsticks to detect increased albuminuria is uncertain. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of urine dipsticks for detecting albuminuria. Methods: A systematic review of studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for detecting albuminuria has been conducted (using as reference standard the albuminuria in a 24-hour sample or the albumin-to-creatinine ratio) in Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The risk of bias of the included studies has been assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Whenever possible, we performed meta-analyses for sensitivity and specificity. The certainty of the evidence has also been assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Results: A total of 14 studies have been included in this review, having assessed all albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) as assessed standard. Each study used different dipstick types. The resulting pooled sensitivity and specificity for each cutoff point were as follows: for ACR >30 mg/g (13 studies): 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.76–0.87) and 0.88 (0.83–0.91); for ACR 30–300 mg/g (7 studies): 0.72 (0.68–0.77) and 0.82 (0.76–0.89); and for ACR >300 mg/g (7 studies): 0.84 (0.71–0.90) and 0.97 (0.95–0.99), respectively. An overall high risk of bias, an important heterogeneity in all pooled analysis, and a very low certainty of the evidence have beenAbstract: Background: The accuracy of urine dipsticks to detect increased albuminuria is uncertain. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of urine dipsticks for detecting albuminuria. Methods: A systematic review of studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for detecting albuminuria has been conducted (using as reference standard the albuminuria in a 24-hour sample or the albumin-to-creatinine ratio) in Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The risk of bias of the included studies has been assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Whenever possible, we performed meta-analyses for sensitivity and specificity. The certainty of the evidence has also been assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Results: A total of 14 studies have been included in this review, having assessed all albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) as assessed standard. Each study used different dipstick types. The resulting pooled sensitivity and specificity for each cutoff point were as follows: for ACR >30 mg/g (13 studies): 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.76–0.87) and 0.88 (0.83–0.91); for ACR 30–300 mg/g (7 studies): 0.72 (0.68–0.77) and 0.82 (0.76–0.89); and for ACR >300 mg/g (7 studies): 0.84 (0.71–0.90) and 0.97 (0.95–0.99), respectively. An overall high risk of bias, an important heterogeneity in all pooled analysis, and a very low certainty of the evidence have been found. Conclusions: Pooled sensitivity and specificity of urine dipsticks have been calculated for different ACR cutoff points. However, the dipstick types differed across studies, and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Thus, further well-designed studies are needed to reach more confident estimates and to assess accuracy differences across dipstick types. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42019124637). Abstract : Albuminuria; Sensitivity and specificity; Renal insufficiency, Chronic. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Heliyon. Volume 7:Issue 11(2021)
- Journal:
- Heliyon
- Issue:
- Volume 7:Issue 11(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 7, Issue 11 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0007-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11
- Subjects:
- Albuminuria -- Sensitivity and specificity -- Renal insufficiency -- Chronic
Research -- Periodicals
Medical sciences -- Periodicals
Natural history -- Periodicals
Social sciences -- Periodicals
Earth sciences -- Periodicals
Physical sciences -- Periodicals
507.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/24058440/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08253 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2405-8440
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20109.xml