SAT0138 PREDICTORS OF CLINICAL EFFICACY OF ABATACEPT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: DATA FROM A LARGE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cagnotto, Giovanni; Willim, Minna; Jacobsson, Lennart; Compagno, Michele; Saevarsdottir, Saedis; Turesson, Carl
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 78(2019)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 1139
• Page End: 1139
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.348
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Abatacept (ABA) is a biologic DMARD (bDMARD) used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since 2006. There are limited data on real life efficacy of ABA, and on predictors for ABA treatment response. Objectives: Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of ABA in the treatment of RA between bionaïve patients and patients with previous bDMARDs and to investigate predictors of clinical response to ABA. Methods: In an observational cohort study, based on data from a large national quality register database, patients with RA diagnosis who initiated treatment with ABA between April 2006 and November 2017 were included. LUNDEX corrected response was defined as the fractions remaining on the drug and achieving the outcome among all who initiated treatment (1). Clinical response at 6 and 12 months was evaluated by means of LUNDEX corrected EULAR (L-EULAR) Good Response and LUNDEX corrected HAQ response (change of ≥0.3 from baseline) (L-HAQ). Predictors for clinical response were investigated using logistic regression, with significance based backwards selection of variables for the final multivariate model. The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Bristol Myers-Squibb. Results: 2716 RA patients were included in the study. More patients in the bionaïve population achieved L-EULAR Good Response and L-HAQ response at 6 and 12 months than bDMARDs experienced patients (Fig. 1a and 1b ). Male sex, no previous bDMARD exposure and a low HAQ score were independent predictors of L-EULAR Good Response at 6 and 12 months (Table 1 ). Lack of previous bDMARD exposure also predicted L-HAQ response at 6 and 12 months. There was a positive associations between baseline HAQ and L-HAQ response at 6 months (multivariate adjusted odds ratio 1.73; 95% CI 1.46-2.05). Conclusion: In patients with RA, response rates for treatment with abatacept were substantially higher in bionaïve patients than in those with previous bDMARD experience. Male sex also predicted LUNDEX corrected EULAR good response to abatacept. Patients with extensive disability, measured by HAQ, were less likely to remain on treatment and achieve a EULAR Good Response, but more likely to have significant HAQ improvement. Reference: [1] Kristensen, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(2):600-6. Disclosure of Interests: Giovanni Cagnotto Consultant for: Novartis, less than 3000 Euro, Minna Willim: None declared, Lennart Jacobsson Consultant for: Eli-Lily, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Abbvie., Michele Compagno: None declared, Saedis Saevarsdottir Employee of: Part-time employee at deCODE Genetics/Amgen Inc, working on genetic research unrelated to this project., Carl Turesson: None declared