Textbook outcome after rectal cancer surgery as a composite measure for quality of care: A population-based study. Issue 11 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Warps, A.K.; Detering, R.; Tollenaar, R.A.E.M.; Tanis, P.J.; Dekker, J.W.T.
• Is Part Of: European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 47:Issue 11(2021)
• Page Start: 2821
• Page End: 2829
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Rectal cancer -- Surgery -- Textbook outcome -- Clinical auditing -- Hospital variation -- Outcome indicator; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Oncologie; Chirurgie (geneeskunde); Electronic journals; Electronic journals -- Sciences; Electronic journals -- Medicine; Electronic journals; 616.994059005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.045
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0748-7983

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Textbook outcome is a composite measure of combined outcome indicators, which has been suggested to be of additional value over single outcome parameters in clinical auditing of surgical treatment. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome after rectal cancer surgery as short-term marker for quality of care. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2019 and registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit were included. Textbook outcome was achieved when the following criteria were met: 30-day and primary hospital admission survival, no reintervention, tumour-free margins, no postoperative complications, a hospital stay of less than 14 days and no readmission. Hospital variation was evaluated in case-mix corrected funnel-plots. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associated factors with textbook outcome. Results: The study population consisted of 20, 521 patients who underwent primary rectal cancer surgery, of whom 56.3% achieved textbook outcome. Postoperative complications were the main contributor to not achieving textbook outcome. Case-mix corrected funnel plots demonstrated that underperforming hospitals in 2012–2015 were no underperformers in 2016–2019 anymore. Female sex, laparoscopic surgery, and rectal resection without defunctioning stoma creation were positively associated with textbook outcome. Conclusion: Textbook outcome after rectal cancer resection is mainly driven by postoperative complications. Although textbook outcome showed some discriminating value for identifying underperforming hospitals, it does not fit the plan-do-check-act cycle of clinical auditing. In our opinion, textbook outcome has little added value to the current outcome indicators for rectal cancer surgery.