A test of the standard cosmological model with geometry and growth. Issue 11 (8th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andrade, Uendert; Anbajagane, Dhayaa; von Marttens, Rodrigo; Huterer, Dragan; Alcaniz, Jailson
• Is Part Of: Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics. Volume 2021:Issue 11(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11-08
• Subjects: dark energy theory -- cosmological parameters from CMBR -- cosmological parameters from LSS -- modified gravity; Cosmology -- Periodicals; Astrophysics -- Periodicals; 523.0105
• DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-7516

Abstract

Abstract: We perform a general test of the ΛCDM and w CDM cosmological models by comparing constraints on the geometry of the expansion history to those on the growth of structure. Specifically, we split the total matter energy density, Ω M, and (for w CDM) dark energy equation of state, w, into two parameters each: one that captures the geometry, and another that captures the growth. We constrain our split models using current cosmological data, including type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, redshift space distortions, gravitational lensing, and cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. We focus on two tasks: (i) constraining deviations from the standard model, captured by the parameters ΔΩ M ≡ Ω M grow -Ω M geom and Δ w ≡ w grow - w geom, and (ii) investigating whether the S 8 tension between the CMB and weak lensing can be translated into a tension between geometry and growth, i.e. ΔΩ M ≠ 0, Δ w ≠ 0. In both the split ΛCDM and w CDM cases, our results from combining all data are consistent with ΔΩ M = 0 and Δ w = 0. If we omit BAO/RSD data and constrain the split w CDM cosmology, we find the data prefers Δ w < 0 at 3.6σ significance and ΔΩ M > 0 at 4.2σ evidence. We also find that for both CMB and weak lensing, ΔΩ M and S 8 are correlated, with CMB showing a slightly stronger correlation. The general broadening of the contours in our extended model does alleviate the S 8 tension, but the allowed nonzero values of ΔΩ M do not encompass the S 8 values that would point toward a mismatch between geometry and growth as the origin of the tension.