Effects of dataset size and interactions on the prediction performance of logistic regression and deep learning models. (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bailly, Alexandre; Blanc, Corentin; Francis, Élie; Guillotin, Thierry; Jamal, Fadi; Wakim, Béchara; Roy, Pascal
• Is Part Of: Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. Volume 213(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: Deep learning -- Machine learning -- Data set size -- Interactions; Medicine -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Biology -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Computers -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Biologie -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Biology -- Computer programs; Medicine -- Computer programs; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106504
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0169-2607

Abstract

Highlights: Machine Learning and Deep Learning models are powerful disease prediction tools. Some of these models were trained on various dataset sizes and compared. ML models were less influenced by the dataset size but needed interaction terms. DL models achieved good results without interaction terms. Well-specified ML models performed better than DL models. Abstract: Background and objective: Machine learning and deep learning models are very powerful in predicting the presence of a disease. To achieve good predictions, those models require a certain amount of data to train on, whereas this amount i) is generally limited and difficult to obtain; and, ii) increases with the complexity of the interactions between the outcome (disease presence) and the model variables. This study compares the ways training dataset size and interactions affect the performance of those prediction models. Methods: To compare the two influences, several datasets were simulated that differed in the number of observations and the complexity of the interactions between the variables and the outcome. A few logistic regressions and neural networks were trained on the simulated datasets and their performance evaluated by cross-validation and compared using accuracy, F1 score, and AUC metrics. Results: Models trained on simulated datasets without interactions provided good results: AUC close to 0.80 with either logistic regression or neural networks. Models trained on simulated dataset with order 2 interactions led also to AUCs close to 0.80 with either logistic regression or neural networks. Models trained on simulated datasets with order 4 interactions led to AUC close to 0.80 with neural networks and 0.85 with penalized logistic regressions. Whatever the interaction order, increasing the dataset size did not significantly affect model performance, especially that of machine learning models. Conclusion: Machine learning models were the less influenced by the dataset size but needed interaction terms to achieve good performance, whereas deep learning models could achieve good performance without interaction terms. Conclusively, with the considered scenarios, well-specified machine learning models outperformed deep learning models.