Investigation of occupant kinematics and injury risk in a reclined and rearward-facing seat under various frontal crash velocities. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ngo, Anh Vu; Becker, Julian; Thirunavukkarasu, Dinesh; Urban, Peter; Koetniyom, Saiprasit; Carmai, Julaluk
• Is Part Of: Journal of safety research. Volume 79(2021)
• Page Start: 26
• Page End: 37
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: Rearward facing -- Highly automated vehicle -- Reclined seating -- Occupant kinematics -- Injury risk; Industrial safety -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Safety -- Periodicals; Accidents, Occupational -- Periodicals; Sécurité du travail -- Périodiques; Accidents -- Prévention -- Périodiques; Accidents -- Prevention; Industrial safety; Periodicals; 363.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4375

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The availability of highly automated driving functions will vastly change the seating configuration in future vehicles. A reclined and rearward-facing seating position could become one of the popular seating positions. The occupant safety needs to be addressed in these novel seating configurations, as novel occupant loading conditions occur and the current standards as well as regulations are not fully applicable. Method: Twelve finite element simulations using a series production seat model and a state of the art 50th percentile male human body model were conducted to investigate the influences of various parameters on the occupant kinematics and injury risk. The varied parameters included the seatback angle, impact speed, and seatback rotational stiffness. Results: The seat model shows a large seatback rotation angle during the frontal crash scenario with high impact speed. A reclining of the seatback angle leads to no significant increase of the injury risk for the assessed injury values. However, the reclining does affect the interaction among the occupant, seatbelt, and seatback. An increase of the seatback rotational stiffness helps reduce brain and chest injury metrics, while neck injury values are higher for the stiffer seatback.