It's a man's world; right? How women's opinions about gender inequality affect physiological responses in men. (April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Domen, Ilona; Scheepers, Daan; Derks, Belle; van Veelen, Ruth
• Other Names: Hodson Gordon guest-editor.; Earle Megan guest-editor.; Craig Maureen A. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Group processes and intergroup relations. Volume 25:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 703
• Page End: 726
• Publication Date: 2022-04
• Subjects: gender identification -- gender inequality -- psychophysiology -- social change -- threat versus challenge; Intergroup relations -- Periodicals; Social groups -- Periodicals; 302.305
• DOI: 10.1177/13684302211042669
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-4302

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined how men respond to women who either challenge or legitimize societal gender inequality, and how gender identification moderates these responses. We hypothesized that men feel less threatened by women who legitimize (vs. challenge) the gender hierarchy, and evaluate these women more positively. To investigate these expectations, we assessed self-reports (Studies 1 and 2) and cardiovascular threat/challenge responses (Study 2). Both studies showed that men experience less negative emotions when presented with a woman who legitimized (vs. challenged) the gender hierarchy. Moreover, among men with a relatively high gender identification, a woman who challenged the gender hierarchy elicited a physiological response pattern indicative of threat, whereas a woman who legitimized the gender hierarchy elicited a pattern indicative of challenge. Results are discussed in terms of social identity theory, status threat, and self-distancing behavior.