Bringing politics back in: interpretations of the peace process and the security challenge in Northern Ireland. (4th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dixon, Paul
• Is Part Of: Small wars & insurgencies. Volume 32:Number 4/5(2021)
• Page Start: 812
• Page End: 836
• Publication Date: 2021-07-04
• Subjects: Northern Ireland -- peace process -- security -- Neoconservative -- Cosmopolitan -- Consociational -- Constructivist; Low-intensity conflicts (Military science) -- Periodicals; Insurgency -- Periodicals; 355.021805
• DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2021.1886389
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-2318

Abstract

ABSTRACT: There are contrasting interpretations of the Northern Ireland peace process which have competing implications for the lessons to be drawn from the conflict. This article offers a Constructivist Realist critique of three leading perspectives on the peace process: Neoconservative, Cosmopolitan and Conservative Realists (or Consociationalists). The Neoconservative perspective emphasises the importance of security policy in defeating terrorists before negotiations. By contrast, Cosmopolitans and Conservative Realists emphasise the importance of constitutions and tend to ignore security. Constructivist Realists argue that all three accounts are over-generalised, provide inadequate understandings of politics and, therefore, the relative success of the peace process.