A protein-supplemented very-low-calorie diet does not mitigate reductions in lean mass and resting metabolic rate in subjects with overweight or obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Issue 12 (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Magkos, Faidon; Hjorth, Mads F.; Asping, Sarah; Rosenkrans, Maria I.; Rasmussen, Sidse I.; Ritz, Christian; Sjödin, Anders; Geiker, Nina R.W.
• Is Part Of: Clinical nutrition. Volume 40:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: 5726
• Page End: 5733
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: Weight loss -- Protein -- Fat-free mass -- Low-calorie diet -- Resting energy expenditure; BMI body mass index -- BW body weight -- CI confidence interval -- DXA dual energy X-ray absorptiometry -- EFSA European Food Safety Authority -- LM lean mass -- RMR resting metabolic rate -- TDR total diet replacement -- VAT visceral adipose tissue -- VLCD very-low-calorie diet; Critically ill -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Diet therapy -- Periodicals; Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals; Enteral feeding -- Periodicals; Enteral Nutrition -- Periodicals; Parenteral Nutrition -- Periodicals; Metabolism -- Periodicals; Diétothérapie -- Périodiques; Alimentation parentérale -- Périodiques; Alimentation entérale -- Périodiques; Nutrition -- Périodiques; Diet therapy; Enteral feeding; Nutrition; Parenteral feeding; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 615.854
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.10.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0261-5614

Abstract

Summary: Background & aims: The European Food Safety Authority recently recommended an increase in the protein content of total diet replacement (TDR) products from 50 to 75 g/day. The rationale was to minimize reductions in lean mass (LM) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) that occur with weight loss, and thereby facilitate maintenance of lost weight. We sought to directly compare the efficacy of TDR regimens with the new vs the current protein requirement. Methods: We randomized 108 adults with overweight or obesity (body mass index 28–40 kg/m 2 ) to very-low-calorie diets (VLCD) with either 52 or 77 g/day protein for 8 weeks (total energy intake of 600 or 700 kcal/day, respectively). LM was determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and RMR by indirect calorimetry. Results: Attrition rate was 22% in both groups. Both VLCDs decreased body weight, fat mass, LM, and RMR (all P < 0.05). Significant time-by-group interactions were detected for weight and fat mass (both P < 0.05), with corresponding reductions being smaller in the higher-protein than the standard-protein VLCD, likely because of the added calories. On the other hand, reductions in LM (6% from baseline) and RMR (9–10% from baseline) did not differ between groups ( P = 0.155 and P = 0.389, respectively), and the contribution of LM to total weight loss was identical (27 ± 2% of lost weight, P = 0.973). Conclusions: Our results indicate that the proposed increase in the protein content of TDR products does not attenuate reductions in LM and RMR in individuals with overweight and obesity who are treated with <800 kcal/day VLCDs for 2 months. Clinical trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT04156165.