The peer review process: a primer for JNIS readers. (17th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hirsch, Joshua A; Manchikanti, Laxmaiah; Albuquerque, Felipe C; Leslie-Mazwi, Thabele M; Lev, Michael H; Linfante, Italo; Mocco, J; Rai, Ansaar T; Schaefer, Pamela W; Tarr, Robert W
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurointerventional surgery. Volume 9(2017)e1
• Page Start: e3
• Page End: e6
• Publication Date: 2015-04-17
• Subjects: Standards; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48
• DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011781
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1759-8478

Abstract

Abstract : Peer review of scientific articles submitted for publication has been such an integral component of innovation in science and medicine that participants (be they readers, reviewers, or editors) seldom consider its complexity. Not surprisingly, much has been written about scientific peer review. The aim of this report is to share some of the elements of that discourse with readers of the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ( JNIS ).