Free‐breathing MR elastography of the lungs: An in vivo study. Issue 1 (31st August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fakhouri, Faisal; Kannengiesser, Stephan; Pfeuffer, Josef; Gokun, Yevgeniya; Kolipaka, Arunark
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 87:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 236
• Page End: 248
• Publication Date: 2021-08-31
• Subjects: free‐breathing lung MRE -- lung density -- lung MRE -- lung stiffness -- MRE; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28986
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Lung stiffness alters with many diseases; therefore, several MR elastography (MRE) studies were performed earlier to investigate the stiffness of the right lung during breathhold at residual volume and total lung capacity. The aims of this study were 1) to estimate shear stiffness of the lungs using MRE under free breathing and demonstrate the measurements' repeatability and reproducibility, and 2) to compare lung stiffness under free breathing to breathhold and as a function of age and gender. Methods: Twenty‐five healthy volunteers were scanned on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Spin‐echo dual‐density spiral and a spin‐echo EPI MRE sequences were used to measure shear stiffness of the lungs during free breathing and breathhold at midpoint of tidal volume, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficient and Bland‐Altman analyses were performed to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the spin‐echo dual‐density spiral–derived shear stiffness. Repeated measures analyses of variances were used to investigate differences in shear stiffness between spin‐echo dual‐density spiral and spin‐echo EPI, right and left lungs, males and females, and different age groups. Results: Free‐breathing MRE sequence was highly repeatable and reproducible (concordance correlation coefficient > 0.86 for both lungs). Lung stiffness was significantly lower in breathhold than in free breathing ( P < .001), which can be attributed to potential stress relaxation of lung parenchyma or breathhold inconsistencies. However, there was no significant difference between different age groups ( P = .08). The left lung showed slightly higher stiffness values than the right lung ( P = .14). There is no significant difference in lung stiffness between genders. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of free‐breathing lung MRE with excellent repeatability and reproducibility. Stiffness changes with age and during the respiratory cycle. However, gender does not influence lungs stiffness.