THU0461 THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR FIBROMYALGIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH BAYESIAN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS. (2nd June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- THU0461 THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR FIBROMYALGIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH BAYESIAN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS. (2nd June 2020)
- Main Title:
- THU0461 THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR FIBROMYALGIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH BAYESIAN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
- Authors:
- Kundakci, B.
Kaur, J.
Shim, S. R.
Hall, M.
Doherty, M.
Zhang, W.
Abhishek, A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as first-line treatment options in the management of fibromyalgia (FM) 1 . However, whether one intervention is more effective than another for specific patient-centred outcomes in FM is unknown. Objectives: To compare the relative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on FM impact questionnaire (FIQ), pain, fatigue, sleep and depression in people with FM. Methods: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing any non-pharmacological intervention versus usual care, placebo or active controls in patients with FM aged >16 years were searched for in seven databases. A common comparator was identified between interventions to develop a network (Figure 1 ). Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% credible interval (CrI) was estimated between interventions. Direct and indirect evidence were pooled using the random effect model. Modified Cochrane's tool was used to assess risk of bias. Results: 78 studies (n = 5, 639 participants) met the inclusion criteria. There was a high risk of bias on blinding and most trials had small sample size (n<50). While multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) was the best for improving pain [-1.28 (-1.84, -0.72)], sleep [-1.14 (-2.38, 0.07)] and depression [-1.20 (-1.99, -0.46)], balneotherapy and exercise were the most effective treatments for FIQ [-1.06 (1.51, -0.61)] and fatigue [-0.75 (-1.35, -0.25)], respectively (Figure 2Abstract : Background: Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as first-line treatment options in the management of fibromyalgia (FM) 1 . However, whether one intervention is more effective than another for specific patient-centred outcomes in FM is unknown. Objectives: To compare the relative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on FM impact questionnaire (FIQ), pain, fatigue, sleep and depression in people with FM. Methods: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing any non-pharmacological intervention versus usual care, placebo or active controls in patients with FM aged >16 years were searched for in seven databases. A common comparator was identified between interventions to develop a network (Figure 1 ). Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% credible interval (CrI) was estimated between interventions. Direct and indirect evidence were pooled using the random effect model. Modified Cochrane's tool was used to assess risk of bias. Results: 78 studies (n = 5, 639 participants) met the inclusion criteria. There was a high risk of bias on blinding and most trials had small sample size (n<50). While multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) was the best for improving pain [-1.28 (-1.84, -0.72)], sleep [-1.14 (-2.38, 0.07)] and depression [-1.20 (-1.99, -0.46)], balneotherapy and exercise were the most effective treatments for FIQ [-1.06 (1.51, -0.61)] and fatigue [-0.75 (-1.35, -0.25)], respectively (Figure 2 ). Data from 47 exercise trials (n = 3, 271 participants) were analysed to examine comparative efficacy of different exercise types. Strengthening showed the greatest benefits for FIQ [-0.76 (-1.39, -0.15)], pain [-0.94 (-1.58, -0.29)] and depression [-0.83 (-1.53, -0.14)], whereas aerobic exercise was the best for fatigue [-0.98 (-2.33, 0.18)] and sleep [-0.96 (-2.08, 0.13)] (Table 1 ). Conclusion: Several non-pharmacological interventions are beneficial for FM. However, the effect size varies between interventions and outcomes. All types of exercises are effective for FIQ and pain apart from flexibility exercise. The results of this study may be used to guide the selection of the most effective non-pharmacological interventions according to the predominant symptom in individual patients. References: [1]Macfarlane GJ et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76(2):3-8-28. Disclosure of Interests: None declared … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 79(2020)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 79(2020)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 79, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 79
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0079-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 467
- Page End:
- 468
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06-02
- Subjects:
- Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.803 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20042.xml