AB0621 TOLERABILITY AND SAFETY OF ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS. (2nd June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Verardi, L.; De Lorenzis, E.; Natalello, G.; Gigante, L.; La Porta, U.; Gremese, E.; Bosello, S. L.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 79(2020)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 1606
• Page End: 1606
• Publication Date: 2020-06-02
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.6335
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by an increased incidence of macro- and microvascular complications. Current evidences on efficacy, safety and tolerability of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in SSc patients are limited, and the indication to this treatment is based on the experience of each single centre or physician. Esophagus and stomach are the portions of the digestive tract that are more frequently affected by adverse events due to ASA exposure. Objectives: We evaluated the incidence of adverse events associated with low-dose ASA treatment in a cohort of patients affected by SSc. Methods: Demographic data and disease features of 302 patients affected by SSc treated with low-dose ASA were collected and patients were followed-up for a median period of 6.9 years (range: 0-20 years). The proportion of patients taking ASA for secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease was also noted. The incidence of discontinuation of the drug, gastrointestinal intolerance, bleeding and death in the observation period was recorded. Results: Patients had a median age of 54.0 years (19.6-89.4); 91.9% were female, 13.2% were smokers and 44.0% had a BMI≥30Kg/m 2 . The prevalence of ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and stroke was of 8.6%, 5.3% and 3.3%, respectively; 48.7% of the patient took ASA in primary cardiovascular prevention. Therapy started after a median disease duration of 4.8 years (range: 0.0- 30.1 years) since the first non-Raynaud symptom and 56.6% of patients had an early disease (less than three years of disease duration). During the observation period, 30 patients (14.3 per 1000 person-years) discontinued ASA after an average period of assumption of 4.6 years (range: 0.3-18.0 years). The main adverse events were heartburn, dyspepsia and hematochezia, recorded in 18 patients (8.6 per 1000 person-years). Eight of them (3.8 per 1000 person-years) had evidence of digestive tract bleeding. Five patients (2.4 per 1000 person-years) discontinued ASA due to recurrent epistaxis. Twenty-eight patients (13.4 per 1000 person-years) died in the follow-up period, 16 of these (7.6 per 1000 person-years) because of SSc-related causes. None of them had evidence of major bleeding. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the incidence of ASA discontinuation. The history of digital ulcers (Log rank test X 2 4.7, p=0.037) and male sex (Log rank test X 2 4.3, p=0.03) were associated with a higher cumulative ASA discontinuation rate due to gastrointestinal intolerance. Conclusion: In our cohort of SSc patients, ASA resulted safe and well tolerated in most cases, despite the risk of gastroesophageal abnormalities due to disease. Although this comforting results, taking in account the lack of controlled-randomized trials about efficacy and safety, the choice to start antiplatelet therapy with ASA should be mandatorily preceded by a careful evaluation of risks and benefits. Furthermore, an attentive monitoring for possible adverse effects is needed during ASA treatment. Patients with digital ulcers and male sex could present less drug tolerability. References: [1]Valentini G et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019. Beckett VL et al. Arthritis Rheum 1984. Kavian N et al. Vascul Pharmacol 2015. Lavie CJ et al. Curr Probl Cardiol 2017. Disclosure of Interests: Lucrezia Verardi: None declared, Enrico De Lorenzis: None declared, Gerlando Natalello: None declared, Laura Gigante: None declared, Umberto La Porta: None declared, Elisa Gremese Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Silvia Laura Bosello Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Boehringer