A multi‐label cascaded neural network classification algorithm for automatic training and evolution of deep cascaded architecture. Issue 7 (22nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pakrashi, Arjun; Mac Namee, Brian
• Other Names: Stahl Frederic Theodor guestEditor.; Neagu Daniel guestEditor.; Campean Felician guestEditor.; Gheorghe Marian guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Expert systems. Volume 38:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-01-22
• Subjects: machine learning -- multi‐label -- neural network; Expert systems (Computer science); 006.33
• DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12671
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-4720

Abstract

Abstract: Multi‐label classification algorithms deal with classification problems where a single datapoint can be classified (or labelled) with more than one class (or label) at the same time. Early multi‐label approaches like binary relevance consider each label individually and train individual binary classifier models for each label. State‐of‐the‐art algorithms like RAkEL, classifier chains, calibrated label ranking, IBLR‐ML+, and BPMLL also consider the associations between labels for improved performance. Like most machine learning algorithms, however, these approaches require careful hyper‐parameter tuning, a computationally expensive optimisation problem. There is a scarcity of multi‐label classification algorithms that require minimal hyper‐parameter tuning. This paper addresses this gap in the literature by proposing CascadeML, a multi‐label classification method based on the existing cascaded neural network architecture, which also takes label associations into consideration. CascadeML grows a neural network architecture incrementally (deep as well as wide) in a two‐phase process as it learns network weights using an adaptive first‐order gradient descent algorithm. This omits the requirement of preselecting the number of hidden layers, nodes, activation functions, and learning rate. The performance of the CascadeML algorithm was evaluated using 13 multi‐label datasets and compared with nine existing multi‐label algorithms. The results show that CascadeML achieved the best average rank over the datasets, performed better than BPMLL (one of the earliest well known multi‐label specific neural network algorithms), and was similar to the state‐of‐the‐art classifier chains and RAkEL algorithms.