Using biological records to infer long-term occupancy trends of mammals in the UK. (December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Using biological records to infer long-term occupancy trends of mammals in the UK. (December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Using biological records to infer long-term occupancy trends of mammals in the UK
- Authors:
- Coomber, Frazer G.
Smith, Bethany R.
August, Tom A.
Harrower, Colin A.
Powney, Gary D.
Mathews, Fiona - Abstract:
- Abstract: Conservation action is usually triggered by detecting trends in species' population size, geographical range, or occupancy (proportion of sites occupied). Robust estimates of these metrics are often required by policy makers and practitioners, yet many species lack dedicated monitoring schemes. An alternative source of data for trend estimation is provided by biological records, i.e., species presence information. In the UK, there are millions of such records, but biological trend assessments are often hindered by biases caused by the unstructured way in which they are collected. Recent advances in occupancy modelling that account for changes in survey effort and detectability over time mean that robust occupancy trends can now be estimated from these records. By grouping mammal species into survey assemblages — species likely to be recorded at the same time — and applying occupancy models, this study provides estimates of long-term (1970 to 2016) occupancy trends for 37 terrestrial mammal species from the UK. The inter-annual occupancy growth rates for these species ranged from -4.26% to 11.25%. This information was used to classify two species as strongly decreasing, five as decreasing, 12 as no change, 11 as increasing and seven as strongly increasing. Viewing the survey assemblages as a whole, the occupancy growth rates for small mammals were, on average, decreasing (-0.8% SD 1.57), whereas bats and deer (0.9% SD 1.30) were increasing (3.8% SD 3.25; 0.9% SDAbstract: Conservation action is usually triggered by detecting trends in species' population size, geographical range, or occupancy (proportion of sites occupied). Robust estimates of these metrics are often required by policy makers and practitioners, yet many species lack dedicated monitoring schemes. An alternative source of data for trend estimation is provided by biological records, i.e., species presence information. In the UK, there are millions of such records, but biological trend assessments are often hindered by biases caused by the unstructured way in which they are collected. Recent advances in occupancy modelling that account for changes in survey effort and detectability over time mean that robust occupancy trends can now be estimated from these records. By grouping mammal species into survey assemblages — species likely to be recorded at the same time — and applying occupancy models, this study provides estimates of long-term (1970 to 2016) occupancy trends for 37 terrestrial mammal species from the UK. The inter-annual occupancy growth rates for these species ranged from -4.26% to 11.25%. This information was used to classify two species as strongly decreasing, five as decreasing, 12 as no change, 11 as increasing and seven as strongly increasing. Viewing the survey assemblages as a whole, the occupancy growth rates for small mammals were, on average, decreasing (-0.8% SD 1.57), whereas bats and deer (0.9% SD 1.30) were increasing (3.8% SD 3.25; 0.9% SD 1.30 respectively), and mid-sized mammals were stable (-0.3 SD 1.72). These results contribute much-needed information on a number of data deficient species, and provide evidence for prioritising conservation action. Highlights: Novel clustering algorithm to group mammal species by survey methods Survey assemblage enabled occupancy models use on biological records. Inter-annual occupancy trends calculated for 37 UK mammal species from 1970 to 2016. 7 species were classified as decreasing, 12 as no change and 18 as increasing. Small mammals generally decreasing, mid-sized mammals stable, and bats and deer increasing … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biological conservation. Volume 264(2021)
- Journal:
- Biological conservation
- Issue:
- Volume 264(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 264, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 264
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0264-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12
- Subjects:
- Citizen science -- Mammals -- Occupancy models -- Bayesian modelling -- Trends -- United Kingdom
Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals
Nature conservation -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
333.9516 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00063207 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109362 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0006-3207
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2075.100000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20002.xml