Clinical associations of functional dyspepsia with gastric dysrhythmia on electrogastrography: A comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis. Issue 12 (8th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Varghese, Chris; Carson, Daniel A.; Bhat, Sameer; Hayes, Tommy C. L.; Gharibans, Armen A.; Andrews, Christopher N.; O'Grady, Greg
• Is Part Of: Neurogastroenterology & motility. Volume 33:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-04-08
• Subjects: biomarkers -- electrogastrography -- functional dyspepsia -- gastric electrical activity -- gastroduodenal disorders -- slow waves; Gastrointestinal system -- Motility -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal system -- Innervation -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14151
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-1925

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common gastroduodenal disorder, yet its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Bioelectrical gastric slow‐wave abnormalities are thought to contribute to its multifactorial pathophysiology. Electrogastrography (EGG) has been used to record gastric electrical activity; however, the clinical associations require further evaluation. Aims: This study aimed to systematically assess the clinical associations of EGG in FD. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched for articles using EGG in adults with FD. Primary outcomes were percentage normal versus abnormal rhythm (bradygastria, normogastria, and tachygastria). Secondary outcomes were dominant power, dominant frequency, percentage coupling, and the meal responses. Results: 1751 FD patients and 555 controls from 47 studies were included. FD patients spent less time in normogastria while fasted (SMD −0.74; 95%CI −1.22 to −0.25) and postprandially (−0.86; 95%CI −1.35 to −0.37) compared with controls. FD patients also spent more fasted time in bradygastria (0.63; 95%CI 0.33–0.93) and tachygastria (0.45; 95%CI 0.12–0.78%). The power ratio (−0.17; 95%CI −0.83–0.48) and dominant frequency meal‐response ratio (0.06; 95%CI −0.08–0.21) were not significantly different to controls. Correlations between EGG metrics and the presence and timing of FD symptoms were inconsistent. EGG methodologies were diverse and variably applied. Conclusion: Abnormal gastric slow‐wave rhythms are a consistent abnormality present in FD, as defined by EGG and, therefore, likely play a role in pathophysiology. The aberrant electrophysiology identified in FD warrants further investigation, including into underlying mechanisms, associated spatial patterns, and symptom correlations. Abstract :