"We have to respect that option": The abortion aversion complex in safety-net healthcare organizations. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Emily; Singh, Sachika; Bommaraju, Aalap; Norris, Alison H.; Bessett, Danielle
• Is Part Of: Social science & medicine. Volume 291(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: Abortion stigma -- Safety-net clinics -- Pregnancy options counseling -- Healthcare administrators -- Title X -- Ohio; Social medicine -- Periodicals; Medical anthropology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine sociale -- Périodiques; Anthropologie médicale -- Périodiques; Santé publique -- Périodiques; Psychologie -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114468
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-9536

Abstract

Abstract: In July 2019, the Trump administration began implementing its domestic gag rule to ban discussion of abortion in pregnancy options counseling and ensure physical separation of contraceptive and abortion services at clinical sites funded by the federal government's Title X Family Planning program. In this paper, we examine how organizational policy utilization correlated with organization-level protocols for discussing abortion in options counseling interactions while the domestic gag rule policy was under legal contest. From April 2018 to July 2019, we conducted in-depth interviews with 50 administrators in charge of setting clinical protocols regarding options counseling after a positive pregnancy test at 20 Title X-covered and 14 non-Title X-covered safety-net healthcare organizations in Ohio. We found that organizational characteristics and Title X policy utilization did not explain the heterogeneity in approaches to abortion referral that administrators reported. Administrators from 2 of 20 organizations covered by Title X policy requirements pre-emptively restricted discussion of abortion in their facilities in advance of policy enactment. Meanwhile, administrators from 10 of 14 non-Title X-covered organizations did not restrict discussion of abortion. Our analysis demonstrates how safety-net healthcare organizations' response to federal policy is shaped by administrators' institutional entrepreneurship within the abortion aversion complex: a pattern of policy miscomprehension and endorsed abortion stigma that facilitates the structural stigmatization of abortion within safety-net healthcare organizations. We conclude that current efforts to reverse the domestic gag rule will fail unless local abortion aversion complexes are targeted with intervention. Highlights: Policies eliminating abortion discussion further stigmatize abortion. Administrators are key, understudied influencers of abortion referral practices. Administrators endorse abortion stigma to avoid funding reductions. Abortion stigma influences administrative institutional entrepreneurship. The abortion aversion complex aids structural abortion stigma in safety-net clinics.