The cost of mining benefits: Localising the resource curse hypothesis. (December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The cost of mining benefits: Localising the resource curse hypothesis. (December 2021)
- Main Title:
- The cost of mining benefits: Localising the resource curse hypothesis
- Authors:
- Owen, J.R.
Kemp, D.
Marais, L. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Local resource curse problems epitomize the difficult interface dynamics confronting resource developers and host communities. These problems centre on the opportunity costs that local people encounter due to their proximity to resource development projects. Our fundamental objection is the working assumption – and in some cases the proposition – that people are getting something for nothing. In this paper we challenge two persistent ideas in the resource economics literature. First, that resource curse problems occur primarily, if not exclusively, at the national level, and second, that mining benefits are cost neutral to communities. We argue that pro-industry constructs such as 'shared value' and 'shared benefit' are detrimental to the study of local resource economies, and in particular, the examination of cost-benefit scenarios in resource enclaves. Our aim in this paper is to draw attention to local resource curse problems. These are effects that involve significant opportunity costs for local communities as a result of their direct participation or near proximity to large-scale resource projects. Highlights: The paper draws attention to local resource curse problems. This includes the creation of local offsets where harms are traded for benefits. We focus on the unmeasured local cost of accessing mine benefits. "Shared value" and "shared benefit" incorrectly assume no-cost of access. The hidden cost of benefits are alarming given the impact profile of miningAbstract: Local resource curse problems epitomize the difficult interface dynamics confronting resource developers and host communities. These problems centre on the opportunity costs that local people encounter due to their proximity to resource development projects. Our fundamental objection is the working assumption – and in some cases the proposition – that people are getting something for nothing. In this paper we challenge two persistent ideas in the resource economics literature. First, that resource curse problems occur primarily, if not exclusively, at the national level, and second, that mining benefits are cost neutral to communities. We argue that pro-industry constructs such as 'shared value' and 'shared benefit' are detrimental to the study of local resource economies, and in particular, the examination of cost-benefit scenarios in resource enclaves. Our aim in this paper is to draw attention to local resource curse problems. These are effects that involve significant opportunity costs for local communities as a result of their direct participation or near proximity to large-scale resource projects. Highlights: The paper draws attention to local resource curse problems. This includes the creation of local offsets where harms are traded for benefits. We focus on the unmeasured local cost of accessing mine benefits. "Shared value" and "shared benefit" incorrectly assume no-cost of access. The hidden cost of benefits are alarming given the impact profile of mining footprints. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Resources policy. Volume 74(2021)
- Journal:
- Resources policy
- Issue:
- Volume 74(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 74, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 74
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0074-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12
- Subjects:
- Impact -- Sustainability -- Shared value -- Social license -- Sustainable development
Mines and mineral resources -- Periodicals
Ressources minérales -- Périodiques
Ressources naturelles -- Gestion -- Périodiques
Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques
333.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014207 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-policy/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102289 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4207
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7777.608600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19982.xml