EORTC QLQ-BR23 and FACT-B for the assessment of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a literature review. (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nguyen, Jasmine; Popovic, Marko; Chow, Edward; Cella, David; Beaumont, Jennifer L; Chu, Dominic; DiGiovanni, Julia; Lam, Henry; Pulenzas, Natalie; Bottomley, Andrew
• Is Part Of: Journal of comparative effectiveness research. Volume 4:Number 2(2015)
• Page Start: 157
• Page End: 166
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: breast cancer -- EORTC -- FACT -- quality of life; Medical care -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Research -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Decision making -- Periodicals; Evidence-based medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine, Comparative -- Periodicals; 362.1072
• DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.76
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2042-6305

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the development, characteristics and validity of two widely used tools in the breast cancer population, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 and the FACT-B.Methods: A literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, OLDMEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify relevant studies.Results: Both tools were found to be reliable and valid. The QLQ-BR23 focuses on physical function, whereas the FACT-B emphasizes emotional well-being. Scoring, item format, organization and response options differ between questionnaires.Conclusion: Overall, both questionnaires are effective in assessing breast cancer-specific quality of life. Clear similarities and differences between the two tools exist. Decision-making between the questionnaires should be based on the purpose and design of the study.