Differences in PlayerLoad and pitch type in collegiate baseball players. Issue 8 (17th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bullock, Garrett S.; Schmitt, Abigail C.; Chasse, Patrick; Little, Barrett A.; Diehl, Lee H.; Butler, Robert J.
• Is Part Of: Sports biomechanics. Volume 20:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 938
• Page End: 946
• Publication Date: 2021-11-17
• Subjects: Baseball pitching -- pitch count -- throwing -- accelerometer -- PlayerLoad; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Sports -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Human mechanics -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2019.1618899
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-3141

Abstract

ABSTRACT: PlayerLoad is derived from a tri-axial accelerometer device and is a measure of an athlete's external training load. Tri-axial accelerometers (Optimeye S5, Catapult Sports, Melbourne, Australia) were worn by 25 collegiate pitchers during a pitching session. Pitches included fastballs, curve balls, sliders, and changeups. Peak and sum PlayerLoad were calculated for fastballs, curve balls, sliders, and changeups. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests (p < 0.01) and effect size indexes (ESI). Peak and sum PlayerLoad were higher for fastballs compared to changeups (N = 20; ESIpeak = 0.47, p= 0.001 and ESISum = 0.13, p = 0.001, respectively). Peak and sum PlayerLoad were not different comparing fastball to curveball (N = 12; ESIpeak = 0.24, p = 0.050 and ESISum <0.01, p = 0.106) and fastball to slider (N = 12; ESIpeak = 0.32, p = 0.088 and ESISum = 0.02, p = 0.221). Fastball velocity (37.1 ± 2.1 m/s) differed from the changeup (33.8 ± 1.9 m/s; p < 0.001), curveball (32.2 ± 1.2; p < 0.001), and slider (33.8 ± 1.3 m/s; p < 0.001). Pitching workload may differ based on pitch type. Pitch counts may not capture true player fatigue due to variability in stresses resulting from different pitch types.