Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent. Issue 6 (30th November 2007)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent. Issue 6 (30th November 2007)
- Main Title:
- Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent
- Authors:
- Campbell, Bruce
Thomson, Helen
Slater, Jessica
Coward, Colin
Wyatt, Katrina
Sweeney, Kieran - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background and objective: There is increasing regulation and concern about the use of material from patients' records. Studies on patients' views have focused on primary care and on use of material for research. This study investigated patients' preferences about whether and how doctors should seek permission for use of specified items of anonymised information from their hospital records for clinical audit, teaching, national data collection and research. Method: A specially designed questionnaire sent to recently discharged patients under the care of medical and surgical specialists. Results: 166/316 (53%) patients completed the questionnaires. The percentage of respondents who "definitely wanted" or "preferred" to be asked for permission for use of anonymised information was highest for medical history (21%) and reasons for treatment (20%). The purpose for which information was requested (eg, research, audit) made little difference to the overall percentages (range 10–12%). 21 (13%) patients "definitely wanted" to be asked for permission for use of some item or proposed use of information—most had no preference or preferred not to be asked. The most popular method for asking permission was signing a form while in hospital, rather than by specific requests later. Conclusions: Most hospital patients have no preference or prefer not to be asked permission for doctors to use information from their records. About 1 in 8 patients would like to be asked forAbstract : Background and objective: There is increasing regulation and concern about the use of material from patients' records. Studies on patients' views have focused on primary care and on use of material for research. This study investigated patients' preferences about whether and how doctors should seek permission for use of specified items of anonymised information from their hospital records for clinical audit, teaching, national data collection and research. Method: A specially designed questionnaire sent to recently discharged patients under the care of medical and surgical specialists. Results: 166/316 (53%) patients completed the questionnaires. The percentage of respondents who "definitely wanted" or "preferred" to be asked for permission for use of anonymised information was highest for medical history (21%) and reasons for treatment (20%). The purpose for which information was requested (eg, research, audit) made little difference to the overall percentages (range 10–12%). 21 (13%) patients "definitely wanted" to be asked for permission for use of some item or proposed use of information—most had no preference or preferred not to be asked. The most popular method for asking permission was signing a form while in hospital, rather than by specific requests later. Conclusions: Most hospital patients have no preference or prefer not to be asked permission for doctors to use information from their records. About 1 in 8 patients would like to be asked for permission, some even for clinical audit of outcomes—although a minority, this could compromise thorough clinical audit. Systems for obtaining permission when patients are admitted to hospital need to be considered. Resolution of uncertainties surrounding legislation on the use of information would be helpful to clinicians. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Quality & safety in health care. Volume 16:Issue 6(2007)
- Journal:
- Quality & safety in health care
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 6(2007)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 6 (2007)
- Year:
- 2007
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2007-0016-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 404
- Page End:
- 408
- Publication Date:
- 2007-11-30
- Journal URLs:
- https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/by/year/2002 ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1136/qshc.2006.020313 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1475-3898
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 20424.xml