O006 Is a short course of azithromycin effective in the treatment of mild to moderate Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID)?. (30th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dean, Gillian; Whetham, Jennifer; Soni, Suneeta; Kerr, Louise; Greene, Linda; Ross, Jonathan; Sabin, Caroline
• Is Part Of: Sexually transmitted infections. Volume 92(2016)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A3
• Page End: A3
• Publication Date: 2016-06-30
• Subjects: Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; HIV infections -- Periodicals; 616.951005
• DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052718.6
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-4973

Abstract

Abstract : Background/introduction: Crucial to treatment success in PID is adherence to therapy. All guidelines recommend 14-days of therapy although many women fail to complete 2-weeks, particularly if they experience side-effects. A shorter course of antibiotics may offer a valuable treatment alternative. Aim(s)/objectives: To compare clinical efficacy/acceptability of standard PID treatment 14-days with 5-day course of antibiotics for mild-moderate PID (pain for <30 days). Methods: A multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority RCT comparing arm-1 (ofloxacin/metronidazole) with arm-2 (azithromycin 1g day-1; 500mg od day-2–5, metronidazole/ceftriaxone). Efficacy was measured using standard pain-scores at baseline and 14–21 day follow-up looking for a 70% reduction; women who failed to complete treatment/return for follow-up were considered treatment failures. Results: N = 313 (152 arm-1, 162 arm-2 with similar baseline characteristics). Median age 25. Lower abdo-pain 95%, discharge 64%, dyspareunia 53%. Baseline pain-score median 8/36 (range 1–26); day 14–21 0/36 (range 0–18). Considering women who failed to complete therapy/return for follow-up as failures, the proportion with 70% pain reduction was 46.7% for arm-1; 42.2% for arm-2 (p = 0.49, difference in proportions (arm-2 minus arm-1) −4.5% (95% CI −15.5%, 6.5%)). For those women completing therapy the proportion with a 70% pain reduction was 68.9% for arm-1; 57.6% for arm-2 (p = 0.11, difference in proportions −11.3% (95% CI −23.9%, −1.3%). There were no significant differences in reported side effects except diarrhoea: 33.6% arm-1 vs 78.1% arm-2 (p = 0.0001). Discussion/conclusion: In terms of pain reduction we could not demonstrate that the shorter azithromycin course was non-inferior to the standard-of-care. Patients also experienced significantly more diarrhoea. This study highlights the importance of using evidence-based treatment regimens.