SAT0479 Laser speckle contrast analysis: a pilot study and systematic literature review of reliability of the quantitative assessment of peripheral blood perfusion in systemic sclerosis. (12th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vanhaecke, A.; Cutolo, M.; Ruaro, B.; Deroo, L.; Ickinger, C.; Melsens, K.; Piette, Y.; De Keyser, F.; Smith, V.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 77(2018)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 1097
• Page End: 1097
• Publication Date: 2018-06-12
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.3953
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Microvasculopathy is an important feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc), making its assessment a key issue in SSc clinical research. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) is a valuable tool to detect and classify microvascular structural alterations. In contrast, laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA), a non-invasive microvascular imaging tool, has been proposed as an objective technique to dynamically evaluate the peripheral blood perfusion (PBP). Objectives: The specific objectives were 1) to perform a pilot study to investigate as first both the intra- and inter-rater reliability of LASCA in an unselected SSc cohort and descriptively in healthy subjects (HS) and 2) to identify the available literature on the reliability of LASCA in SSc by a systematic literature review. Methods: First, a pilot study was performed to assess the reliability of LASCA to measure the PBP at the level of the fingers in an unselected cohort SSc patients and descriptively in HS. Intra-rater reliability was assessed by having a first anchor rater performing the measurements at 2 time-points (within 15 min) and inter-rater reliability by subsequently having the first anchor rater and a team of 3 s raters performing the measurements in 15 SSc and 30 HS (see figure 1). As external validation, the measurements were repeated with a second anchor rater in a distinct cohort of 15 SSc patients. Reliability was described by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The systematic search was performed to identify relevant full-text articles in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. All retrieved articles were screened on title, abstract and full-text level, reference lists were additionally searched. Results: Thirty SSc patients (5 men, 25 women; mean age 52±17 y; 1LSSc, 25LcSSc, 4DcSSc; 14 vasodilatory therapy) and 30 HS (8 men, 22 women; mean age 33±11 y) underwent LASCA measurements. ICC for intra-rater reliability of the first anchor was 0.95 (95% CI 0.86–0.98) in SSc and 0.93 (95%CI 0.83–0.97) in HS, the ICC for inter-rater reliability was 0.97 (95%CI 0.90–0.99) in SSc and 0.93 in HS. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anchor 2 was 0.78 (95%CI 0.46–0.92) and 0.87 (95%CI 0.67–0.96) respectively. The systematic search identified 64 unique articles, of which 12 were eligible for full-text review. Two additional references were identified through a reference search of retrieved articles. Only 1 of the 14 selected references that met the inclusion criteria documented reliability as outcome and was included in the final analysis. This pilot study by Lambrecht et al measured the PBP at the level of the fingertips and reported ICC values varying from 0.82–0.91 for the dorsal and 0.74–0.86 for the volar fingertips. Conclusions: The body of knowledge regarding intra- and inter-rater reliability of LASCA in SSc is very limited. Only one manuscript reporting very good inter-rater reliability of PBP measurements of the distal fingertips by LASCA could be withheld. These results could be confirmed by our pilot study. In addition, we demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability of LASCA measurements for the evaluation of the PBP of the hands in SSc patients and HS. Disclosure of Interest: None declared