388Investigating the utility of the customised fetal growth chart: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. (2nd September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 388Investigating the utility of the customised fetal growth chart: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. (2nd September 2021)
- Main Title:
- 388Investigating the utility of the customised fetal growth chart: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
- Authors:
- Gibbons, Kristen
Beckmann, Michael
Flenady, Vicki
Gardenre, Glenn
Gray, Peter - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: To determine if the routine use of a customised fetal growth chart, when compared to a standard growth chart, reduces the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome through increased detection of adverse growth. Methods: A double-blind, single centre, randomised controlled trial was conducted. All women with a singleton pregnancy receiving routine antenatal care through hospital clinics were included and randomised to either a standard growth chart (SC) or a customised growth chart (CC). Serial measurements of symphyseal fundal height (SFH) were plotted onto the chart in the electronic clinical record; pre-programmed alerts notified the clinician when growth or size required review. The primary outcome measure was a composite perinatal morbidity/mortality outcome. Results: 3993 women were recruited; 45.4% nulliparous; 50.0% Caucasian, 17.8% Asian; 34.9% were overweight/obese prior to pregnancy; average 30 (SD 5.5) years old. The median (IQR) number of growth alerts was 2 (0-3) for both groups (p = 0.378); there was no difference in the total number of ultrasounds per pregnancy (median [IQR] 3 [2-4] for both groups, p = 0.266). There was no significant difference in primary composite outcome (CC 6.4%, SC 7.5%, p = 0.171) or individual components, apart from stillbirth (CC n = 1 0.05%, SC n = 8 0.4%, p = 0.039). Conclusions: Use of a CC resulted in no difference in primary outcome, number of growth alerts or number of ultrasounds. Key messages: In a large,Abstract: Background: To determine if the routine use of a customised fetal growth chart, when compared to a standard growth chart, reduces the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome through increased detection of adverse growth. Methods: A double-blind, single centre, randomised controlled trial was conducted. All women with a singleton pregnancy receiving routine antenatal care through hospital clinics were included and randomised to either a standard growth chart (SC) or a customised growth chart (CC). Serial measurements of symphyseal fundal height (SFH) were plotted onto the chart in the electronic clinical record; pre-programmed alerts notified the clinician when growth or size required review. The primary outcome measure was a composite perinatal morbidity/mortality outcome. Results: 3993 women were recruited; 45.4% nulliparous; 50.0% Caucasian, 17.8% Asian; 34.9% were overweight/obese prior to pregnancy; average 30 (SD 5.5) years old. The median (IQR) number of growth alerts was 2 (0-3) for both groups (p = 0.378); there was no difference in the total number of ultrasounds per pregnancy (median [IQR] 3 [2-4] for both groups, p = 0.266). There was no significant difference in primary composite outcome (CC 6.4%, SC 7.5%, p = 0.171) or individual components, apart from stillbirth (CC n = 1 0.05%, SC n = 8 0.4%, p = 0.039). Conclusions: Use of a CC resulted in no difference in primary outcome, number of growth alerts or number of ultrasounds. Key messages: In a large, pragmatic RCT use of a CC in conjunction with serial SFH measurements may infer some benefit over a SC, particularly in relation to stillbirth. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of epidemiology. Volume 50(2021)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- International journal of epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 50(2021)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0050-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-02
- Subjects:
- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
614.4 - Journal URLs:
- http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ije/dyab168.225 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0300-5771
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.244000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19886.xml