Experimental evaluation of the primary fixation stability of uncemented ceramic hip resurfacing implants. (April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vogel, Danny; Henke, Paul; Haenel, Annika; Mokros, Jan; Liebelt, Martin; Bader, Rainer
• Is Part Of: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Volume 236:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 496
• Page End: 503
• Publication Date: 2022-04
• Subjects: Ceramic hip resurfacing -- turn-off test -- turn-off moment -- fixation stability -- press-fit fixation; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; Medical instruments and apparatus -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1177/09544119211070892
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0954-4119

Abstract

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is associated with increased frictional moments compared to standard heads owing to their large diameter. High frictional moments may harbor the risk of the implant loosening if the frictional moments exceed the fixation stability of the hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Therefore, the aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the fixation stability of ceramic hip resurfacing implants through a turn-off test. The test specimens, made of alumina toughened zirconia (ATZ) ceramics with an inner titanium-coated surface and square base bodies for better application to the test setup, were pushed on artificial bone materials until a predefined seating depth was achieved. Thereafter, the specimens were turned off from the artificial bone material by using a lever-arm and the turn-off moments were calculated. The density of the artificial bone material utilized (15 and 25 pcf), the press-fit (0.4 and 0.8 mm) and the size of the test specimens varied. The push-on forces ranged from 0.6 ± 0.1 kN to 5.6 ± 0.5 kN depending on the press-fit and artificial bone material. The turn-off moments relied on the respective press-fit, artificial bone material and size of the specimen. They belonged between the range of 8.5 ± 0.4 Nm and 105.4 ± 0.2 Nm. Most of the previously described frictional moments are lower compared to the turn-off moments determined in this study. However, in the worst-case scenario, the turn-off moments of the hip resurfacing implants may be reduced, especially when the adjacent bone stock has a low mineral density.