245Comparison of methods for classifying heterogeneity in gestational diabetes (GDM) and association with outcomes. (2nd September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 245Comparison of methods for classifying heterogeneity in gestational diabetes (GDM) and association with outcomes. (2nd September 2021)
- Main Title:
- 245Comparison of methods for classifying heterogeneity in gestational diabetes (GDM) and association with outcomes
- Authors:
- Gibbons, Kristen
McIntyre, David
Ma, Ronald
Tam, Wing Hung
Madsen, Lene Ring
Sacks, David
Catalano, Pat - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Clinical experience suggests that diverse clinical subtypes exist within the broader diagnosis of GDM. Analysis from a single centre recently outlined heterogeneity in GDM with respect to insulin secretion and sensitivity, defining four GDM subtypes: 1) GDMsecr (<25 th centile HOMA-β (Hb) for non-GDM); 2) GDMsens (<25 th centile Matsuda Index for non-GDM); 3) GDMmixed (both GDMsecr and GDMsens ); 4) GDMND, no defect (neither GDMsecr and GDMsens ). Classification using these subtypes is associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: Following similar methodology, women with GDM were classified into four subtypes including comparison of Hb, insulinogenic index (II) and Stumvoll first-phase estimate (SV) for defining GDMsecr . Analyses compared neonatal outcomes with non-GDM women and between GDM groups using c 2 tests and regression analyses adjusted for multiple confounders including maternal age, BMI and HAPO study centre. Results: Hb, II and SV gave divergent results for GDMsecr, with only 19% concordance. In all analyses, GDMND (10% by Hb, 6% by II, 6% by SV) showed outcome frequencies similar to those of non-GDM women; groups 1-3 showed higher risks (p < 0.01 vs non GDM). These results persisted in the fully adjusted model (aOR generally >2.0). Conclusions: Different clinical subtypes in GDM are associated with differing risks of adverse outcome. Key messages: Determination of GDM subtype can assist in assessing GDM women at higher risk of adverseAbstract: Background: Clinical experience suggests that diverse clinical subtypes exist within the broader diagnosis of GDM. Analysis from a single centre recently outlined heterogeneity in GDM with respect to insulin secretion and sensitivity, defining four GDM subtypes: 1) GDMsecr (<25 th centile HOMA-β (Hb) for non-GDM); 2) GDMsens (<25 th centile Matsuda Index for non-GDM); 3) GDMmixed (both GDMsecr and GDMsens ); 4) GDMND, no defect (neither GDMsecr and GDMsens ). Classification using these subtypes is associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: Following similar methodology, women with GDM were classified into four subtypes including comparison of Hb, insulinogenic index (II) and Stumvoll first-phase estimate (SV) for defining GDMsecr . Analyses compared neonatal outcomes with non-GDM women and between GDM groups using c 2 tests and regression analyses adjusted for multiple confounders including maternal age, BMI and HAPO study centre. Results: Hb, II and SV gave divergent results for GDMsecr, with only 19% concordance. In all analyses, GDMND (10% by Hb, 6% by II, 6% by SV) showed outcome frequencies similar to those of non-GDM women; groups 1-3 showed higher risks (p < 0.01 vs non GDM). These results persisted in the fully adjusted model (aOR generally >2.0). Conclusions: Different clinical subtypes in GDM are associated with differing risks of adverse outcome. Key messages: Determination of GDM subtype can assist in assessing GDM women at higher risk of adverse clinical outcome and help guide clinical practice. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of epidemiology. Volume 50(2021)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- International journal of epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 50(2021)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0050-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-02
- Subjects:
- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
614.4 - Journal URLs:
- http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ije/dyab168.226 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0300-5771
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.244000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19885.xml