Alternative Approaches to Ensuring Adequate Nurse Staffing: The Effect of State Legislation on Hospital Nurse Staffing. (9th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Han, Xinxin; Pittman, Patricia; Barnow, Burt
• Is Part Of: Medical care. Volume 59:Number 10 (2021)Supplement 5
• Page Start: S463
• Page End: S470
• Publication Date: 2021-10-09
• Subjects: hospital staffing -- nurse staffing legislation -- nurse staffing mandate -- staffing committee -- public reporting; Economics, Medical -- Periodicals; Insurance, Health -- Periodicals; Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques; Soins médicaux -- Périodiques; Medical economics -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- United States -- Periodicals; Comprehensive Health Care -- Periodicals; Personal Health Services -- Periodicals; Gezondheidszorg; Économie de la santé -- Périodiques; Santé, Services de -- Périodiques; Health insurance; Medical economics; United States; Periodicals; 362.10973
• DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001614
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7079

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Abstract : Objective: The objective of this study was to addresses the basic question of whether alternative legislative approaches are effective in encouraging hospitals to increase nurse staffing. Methods: Using 16 years of nationally representative hospital-level data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) annual survey, we employed a difference-in-difference design to compare changes in productive hours per patient day for registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical/vocational nurses (LPNs), and nursing assistive personnel (NAP) in the state that mandated staffing ratios, states that legislated staffing committees, and states that legislated public reporting, to changes in states that did not implement any nurse staffing legislation before and after the legislation was implemented. We constructed multivariate linear regression models to assess the effects with hospital and year fixed effects, controlling for hospital-level characteristics and state-level factors. Results: Compared with states with no legislation, the state that legislated minimum staffing ratios had an 0.996 ( P <0.01) increase in RN hours per patient day and 0.224 ( P <0.01) increase in NAP hours after the legislation was implemented, but no statistically significant changes in RN or NAP hours were found in states that legislated a staffing committee or public reporting. The staffing committee approach had a negative effect on LPN hours (difference-in-difference=−0.076, P <0.01), while the public reporting approach had a positive effect on LPN hours (difference-in-difference=0.115, P <0.01). There was no statistically significant effect of staffing mandate on LPN hours. Conclusions: When we included California in the comparison, our model suggests that neither the staffing committee nor the public reporting approach alone are effective in increasing hospital RN staffing, although the public reporting approach appeared to have a positive effect on LPN staffing. When we excluded California form the model, public reporting also had a positive effect on RN staffing. Future research should examine patient outcomes associated with these policies, as well as potential cost savings for hospitals from reduced nurse turnover rates.