Update on penile sparing surgery for penile cancer. Issue 1 (8th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anastasiadis, Eleni; Ayres, Benjamin; Watkin, Nick
• Is Part Of: Current opinion in urology. Volume 32:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 7
• Publication Date: 2022-01-08
• Subjects: centralisation of care -- glansectomy -- patient-reported outcome measures -- penile cancer -- penile sparing surgery; Urology -- Periodicals; Review Literature -- Bibliography; Review Literature -- Periodicals; Male Urogenital Diseases -- Bibliography; Male Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Female Urogenital Diseases -- Bibliography; Female Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Bibliography; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.6005
• DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000939
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-6586

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose of review: Penile sparing surgery (PSS) is considered the standard of care in penile cancer where appropriate, as preservation of the penis may enable the patient to maintain urinary and sexual function. This review will focus on the latest developments over the past two years. Recent findings: In this review, we discuss the latest findings in oncological outcomes in PSS, specifically glansectomy. We also introduce technology that may be useful in improving the precision of surgical resection margins in PSS. Finally, we consider the value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and consider how research in this area can be improved. Summary: A recent study has found a correlation between local recurrences (LR) and worse overall and cancer-specific survival in glansectomy, which challenges the belief that LR do not confer worse oncological outcomes. Despite numerous studies evaluating PROMs in penile cancer/PSS, few of these studies provide quality evidence of the 'supportive care needs'. A shift in research is required to identify those men at most risk of distress and to identify ways to support men diagnosed with penile cancer.