The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities. (29th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Volz, L; Collins-Fekete, C-A; Bär, E; Brons, S; Graeff, C; Johnson, R P; Runz, A; Sarosiek, C; Schulte, R W; Seco, J
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 66:Number 23(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11-29
• Subjects: particle CT -- helium ions -- particle therapy -- dual-energy CT -- tissue -- proton ct -- range accuracy; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac33ec
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: This work provides a quantitative assessment of helium ion CT (HeCT) for particle therapy treatment planning. For the first time, HeCT based range prediction accuracy in a heterogeneous tissue phantom is presented and compared to single-energy x-ray CT (SECT), dual-energy x-ray CT (DECT) and proton CT (pCT). HeCT and pCT scans were acquired using the US pCT collaboration prototype particle CT scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. SECT and DECT scans were done with a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash and converted to RSP. A Catphan CTP404 module was used to study the RSP accuracy of HeCT. A custom phantom of 20 cm diameter containing several tissue equivalent plastic cubes was used to assess the spatial resolution of HeCT and compare it to DECT. A clinically realistic heterogeneous tissue phantom was constructed using cranial slices from a pig head placed inside a cylindrical phantom (ø150 mm). A proton beam (84.67 mm range) depth-dose measurement was acquired using a stack of GafchromicTM EBT-XD films in a central dosimetry insert in the phantom. CT scans of the phantom were acquired with each modality, and proton depth-dose estimates were simulated based on the reconstructions. The RSP accuracy of HeCT for the plastic phantom was found to be 0.3 ± 0.1%. The spatial resolution for HeCT of the cube phantom was 5.9 ± 0.4 lp cm −1 for central, and 7.6 ± 0.8 lp cm −1 for peripheral cubes, comparable to DECT spatial resolution (7.7 ± 0.3 lp cm −1 and 7.4 ± 0.2 lp cm −1, respectively). For the pig head, HeCT, SECT, DECT and pCT predicted range accuracy was 0.25%, −1.40%, −0.45% and 0.39%, respectively. In this study, HeCT acquired with a prototype system showed potential for particle therapy treatment planning, offering RSP accuracy, spatial resolution, and range prediction accuracy comparable to that achieved with a commercial DECT scanner. Still, technical improvements of HeCT are needed to enable clinical implementation.