Beyond TRL – Understanding institutional readiness for implementation of nature-based solutions. Issue 127 (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Van Cauwenbergh, N.; Dourojeanni, P.A.; van der Zaag, P.; Brugnach, M.; Dartee, K.; Giordano, R.; Lopez-Gunn, E.
• Is Part Of: Environmental science & policy. Issue 127(2022)
• Page Start: 293
• Page End: 302
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: Nature-based solutions -- Uncertainty -- Institutional readiness; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Sciences de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Environmental sciences; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70561
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-9011

Abstract

Abstract: This paper explores the concept of "institutional readiness" (IR) applied to the adoption and mainstreaming of Nature-based solutions (NBS) to deal with climate related risks. We argue that barriers towards up-scaling and mainstreaming of NBS are a manifestation of uncertainty, and are often associated with the 'readiness' of the institutional setting rather than with the readiness of the NBS technology itself. We align the concepts of Institutional Readiness (IR) to the more widely used concept of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to understand drivers and barriers for adoption of NBS and analyse the role of institutional capacity. We illustrate this with the case study of the Urban Water Buffer Spangen in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, which is an NBS with high TRL. To do so, we constructed a timeline of the design and implementation process of the NBS, identifying and classifying key uncertainties as well as the strategies applied to deal with these uncertainties, particularly in the institutional context. Our results indicate that for mainstreaming of NBS, Institutional Readiness (IR) should be at a degree where strategies to deal with uncertainties in institutional, organizational and governance contexts can be integrated in the design and planning process. We claim that the concept of IR should be considered in its role to deal with uncertainty, in order to close the documented gap of NBS implementation and mainstreaming. Highlights: A timeline analysis of NBS implementation identifies its key drivers and barriers. Uncertainties need to be managed, especially in the social system. Institutional readiness (IR) is crucial to facilitate adoption of NBS. IR concept useful to inform strategies that increase institutional capacity for NBS.