An algorithm for the automatic parametrization of wood volume equations from Terrestrial Laser Scanning point clouds: application in Pinus pinaster. Issue 7 (3rd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prendes, Covadonga; Cabo, Carlos; Ordoñez, Celestino; Majada, Juan; Canga, Elena
• Is Part Of: GIScience & remote sensing. Volume 58:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: 1130
• Page End: 1150
• Publication Date: 2021-10-03
• Subjects: diameters along the stem -- total height -- anomalous sections -- Pinus pinaster; Geodesy -- Periodicals; Cartography -- Periodicals; Aerial photogrammetry -- Periodicals; Remote sensing -- Periodicals; 526.05
• DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2021.1972712
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1548-1603

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The parametrization of wood volume equations has traditionally been carried out with destructive samplings, which are highly resource-intensive. These equations must be specifically set up for each species and set of conditions, meaning that, in many cases, they are unfeasible or non-existent. Here, we present a nondestructive and fully automated methodology for the parametrization of merchantable volume equations from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data, which aims at being applicable to any species and stand typology. It is based on the estimation of diameters along the stem and the height of each tree, including a robust system for the automatic identification and correction of anomalous values. The implementation considers several types of volume equations, the most suitable equation being selected and parameterized using the diameter and height estimations. The methodology was tested in a Pinus pinaster plot with 428 trees, steep slopes, low branches and dense understory. The results showed that 97% of trees were automatically detected, and RMSE of the height and diameter estimations was 1.52 m and 1.14 cm, respectively. A volume ratio equation was automatically selected as the best option for the test dataset. RMSE in automatic volume estimations was 0.0233 m 3, and 0.0149 m 3 using diameters reviewed by an operator.