Determining cancer risk: the evolutionary multistage model or total stem cell divisions?. Issue 1941 (23rd December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nunney, Leonard; Thai, Kevin
• Is Part Of: Proceedings. Volume 287:Issue 1941(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12-23
• Subjects: cancer -- multistage carcinogenesis -- multistep carcinogenesis -- lifetime stem cell divisions -- Peto's paradox -- evolution; Biology -- Periodicals; 570.5
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2291
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-8452

Abstract

Abstract : A recent hypothesis proposed that the total number of stem cell divisions in a tissue (TSCD model) determine its intrinsic cancer risk; however, a different model—the multistage model—has long been used to understand how cancer originates. Identifying the correct model has important implications for interpreting the frequency of cancers. Using worldwide cancer incidence data, we applied three tests to the TSCD model and an evolutionary multistage model of carcinogenesis (EMMC), a model in which cancer suppression is recognized as an evolving trait, with natural selection acting to suppress cancers causing a significant mean loss of Darwinian fitness. Each test supported the EMMC but contradicted the TSCD model. This outcome undermines results based on the TSCD model quantifying the relative importance of 'bad luck' (the random accumulation of somatic mutations) versus environmental and genetic factors in determining cancer incidence. Our testing supported the EMMC prediction that cancers of large rapidly dividing tissues predominate late in life. Another important prediction is that an indicator of recent oncogenic environmental change is an unusually high mean fitness loss due to cancer, rather than a high lifetime incidence. The evolutionary model also predicts that large and/or long-lived animals have evolved mechanisms of cancer suppression that may be of value in preventing or controlling human cancers.