Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy. Issue 3 (20th August 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stegeman, Inge; de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R; Stoop, Esther M; van Leerdam, Monique E; Dekker, Evelien; van Ballegooijen, Marjolein; Kuipers, Ernst J; Fockens, Paul; Kraaijenhagen, Roderik A; Bossuyt, Patrick M
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 63:Issue 3(2014)
• Page Start: 466
• Page End: 471
• Publication Date: 2013-08-20
• Subjects: Screening -- Cancer Epidemiology -- Cancer Prevention -- Colorectal Cancer; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is increasingly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening but has a less than perfect sensitivity. Combining risk stratification, based on established risk factors for advanced neoplasia, with the FIT result for allocating screenees to colonoscopy could increase the sensitivity and diagnostic yield of FIT-based screening. We explored the use of a risk prediction model in CRC screening. Design: We collected data in the colonoscopy arm of the Colonoscopy or Colonography for Screening study, a multicentre screening trial. For this study 6600 randomly selected, asymptomatic men and women between 50 years and 75 years of age were invited to undergo colonoscopy. Screening participants were asked for one sample FIT (OC-sensor) and to complete a risk questionnaire prior to colonoscopy. Based on the questionnaire data and the FIT results, we developed a multivariable risk model with the following factors: total calcium intake, family history, age and FIT result. We evaluated goodness-of-fit, calibration and discrimination, and compared it with a model based on primary screening with FIT only. Results: Of the 1426 screening participants, 1112 (78%) completed the questionnaire and FIT. Of these, 101 (9.1%) had advanced neoplasia. The risk based model significantly increased the goodness-of-fit compared with a model based on FIT only (p<0.001). Discrimination improved significantly with the risk-based model (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: from 0.69 to 0.76, (p=0.02)). Calibration was good (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; p=0.94). By offering colonoscopy to the 102 patients at highest risk, rather than to the 102 cases with a FIT result >50 ng/mL, 5 more cases of advanced neoplasia would be detected (net reclassification improvement 0.054, p=0.073). Conclusions: Adding risk based stratification increases the accuracy FIT-based CRC screening and could be used in preselection for colonoscopy in CRC screening programmes.