Assessing radiation risk perception by means of a European stakeholder survey. (15th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Della Monaca, Sara; Dini, Valentina; Grande, Sveva; Palma, Alessandra; Tkaczyk, Alan H; Koch, Rein; Murakas, Rein; Perko, Tanja; Duranova, Tatiana; Salomaa, Sisko; Roivainen, Päivi; Willrodt, Christine; Grigioni, Mauro; Bouffler, Simon
• Is Part Of: Journal of radiological protection. Volume 41:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 1145
• Page End: 1165
• Publication Date: 2021-11-15
• Subjects: ionising radiation -- risk perception -- radiation protection; Radiation -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Health Physics -- Periodicals; Radiation Monitoring -- Periodicals; Radiation Protection -- Periodicals; Rayonnement -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Fulltext; Internet Resource; Periodical; 363.179905
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abf75a
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0952-4746

Abstract

Abstract: It is increasingly recognised that stakeholder views can be essential for ascertaining the credibility of those entrusted with protection of the public and workers against radiation risks, the robustness of the approaches to protection and the relevance of research underpinning radiation protection (RP). The CONCERT European Joint Programme of RP research included consideration of stakeholder views. These were evaluated by means of a publicly available survey, translated into 15 languages, to encourage responses from a wide range of European countries. The survey ran in 2017 and received some 1961 responses from many countries, although response rates varied widely between countries. The survey respondents were largely highly educated, with many having a professional connection to RP or the use of radiation in medicine or industry. Survey results indicated a high level of scientific/technical knowledge relevant to RP and indicated a general trust of most actors involved in the RP field, perhaps unsurprisingly given the nature of the sampled population. Most expressed a reasonable level of satisfaction with the information available to them on radiation risk, but there is clearly room for improvement. Additionally, the survey identified potential training needs amongst the groups who responded. It is concluded that, while the survey results are limited by the non-representativeness of the respondents by comparison with the population of the European Union as a whole, it has been successful in gaining insights into areas where communication could be improved, where professional training gaps are present and where research could help to build wider trust in RP.