Sexual orientation‐based disparities in bone health: Evidence of reduced bone mineral density and mineral content among sexual minority men but not women in multiple NHANES waves. Issue 6 (11th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gibb, James K.; Shattuck, Eric C.
• Is Part Of: American journal of human biology. Volume 33:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-11-11
• Subjects: Human biology -- Periodicals; Physical anthropology -- Periodicals; Biologie humaine -- Périodiques; Anthropologie physique -- Périodiques; 612
• DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23534
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1042-0533

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Sexual minority (SM) people experience significant stress associated with stigma, contributing to a higher rate of adverse health outcomes. Several known factors (eg, smoking) elevate risk of poor bone health, but to date little research has examined disparities in bone health among SM people. To address this, we analyzed sexual orientation differences in an available bone mineral density (BMD) cross‐sectional dataset assessed via dual X‐ray absorptiometry. Methods: We combined the 2007 to 2008, 2009 to 2010, and 2013 to 2014 cycles of US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to examine sexual orientation‐based differences in z ‐scored BMD in the proximal femur (greater trochanter and intertrochanter locations), bone mineral content (BMC) in the femur and spine, and osteoporosis risk among Lesbian/Gay (n = 53), Bisexual (n = 97), Same‐Sex Experienced (n = 103), and Heterosexual (n = 2990) adults. Results: Sexual orientation‐based disparities in bone mass were observed across all anatomical sites. This effect was due to differences between heterosexual and gay men and persisted in linear regressions after adjusting for risk factors. We found differences in femoral and femoral neck BMC in heterosexual and gay men ( P = .02) and in femoral, femoral neck and spinal BMC between heterosexual and bisexual women ( P = .05). Sexual orientation remained significant in BMC regressions. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that SM men but not women are at greater risk for poor bone health relative to heterosexuals and this disparity is independent of the lifestyle and psychosocial risks included in our models.