Research ethics beyond the IRB: Selection bias and the direction of innovation in applied economics. Issue 4 (7th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Michler, Jeffrey D.; Masters, William A.; Josephson, Anna
• Is Part Of: Applied economic perspectives and policy. Volume 43:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 1352
• Page End: 1365
• Publication Date: 2021-01-07
• Subjects: induced innovation -- research misconduct -- research practice -- role of economists; Agriculture -- Economic aspects -- Periodicals; Agriculture and state -- Periodicals; 338.105
• DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13132
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2040-5790

Abstract

Abstract: Principles for ethical behavior in the context of research are codified into rules that may change over time to meet peoples' needs in specific institutions, including universities and professional associations. This paper aims to spark discussion about a set of ethical choices beyond those addressed by an IRB or recent association policy statements. Our specific focus is topic selection and the role of researchers' interests and incentives in determining the kinds of research that we do. Using the principle of induced innovation, we show how changing incentives can influence the direction of research effort and thereby affect the kinds of policies or technologies that are supported by available evidence. With this paper, we hope to generate discussion among applied economists about selection bias in research and how we can use insights from economics itself to guide topic selection. JEL CLASSIFICATION: A11; A14; B41; Q00 Abstract : Related Content: What Do you Mean by "Informed Consent"? Ethics in Economic Development Research Related Content: The Evolving Ethics of Analysis, Publication, and Transparency in Applied Economics Related Content: Ulysses' pact or Ulysses' raft: Using pre‐analysis plans in experimental and nonexperimental research