Analytical model predicting the concrete tensile stress development in the restrained shrinkage ring test. (8th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Yingda; Afroz, Sumaiya; Nguyen, Quang Dieu; Kim, Taehwan; Eisenträger, Johanna; Castel, Arnaud; Xu, Tengfei
• Is Part Of: Construction & building materials. Volume 307(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11-08
• Subjects: Tensile stress model -- Degree of restraint -- Tensile creep -- Fly ash -- Ground granulated blast furnace slag -- Restrained ring test; Building materials -- Periodicals; 624.18
• DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124930
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0950-0618

Abstract

Highlights: A new analytical model of the restrained ring test is proposed. The analytical model is based on the age-adjusted effective modulus theory. Free shrinkage and tensile creep were measured on prism and dog-bone specimens. The model was validated by 21 concrete mixes with SCMs and various strength grades. A numerical finite element simulation was used to validate new analytical model. Abstract: Concrete structures may experience unexpected cracking at an early age. Early age cracking can be induced by restrained deformations where tensile stress generated in concrete exceeds its tensile strength. The restrained concrete ring test is often used to evaluate the ability of concrete to resist early age cracking induced by shrinkage. This paper proposed an analytical model of the restrained ring test by capturing the effect of both restrained shrinkage and tensile creep based on the age-adjusted effective modulus theory. The analytical model allows for accurately predicting the tensile stress of the restrained concrete ring based on the experimental measurements of the time-dependent development of elastic modulus, total free shrinkage, and tensile creep of concrete. A numerical finite element simulation was also successfully carried out to validate the new analytical model. Importantly, the model was validated considering a total of 21 concretes consisting of 6 strength grades ranging from 25 MPa to 100 MPa. For each grade, one fly ash blend (30%), two GGBFS blends (40% and 60%) and a reference mix without supplementary cementitious materials were tested.