Calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis for children with symptomatic pes planovalgus: does fixation improve outcomes?. Issue 3 (18th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hyer, Lauren C.; Carpenter, Ashley M.; Swetenburg, John R.; Westberry, David E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Volume 30:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 273
• Page End: 281
• Publication Date: 2020-08-18
• Subjects: calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis -- lateral column lengthening -- symptomatic pes planovalgus; Pediatric orthopedics -- Periodicals; 618.927005
• DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000796
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1060-152X

Abstract

Abstract : Lateral column lengthening is a common surgical procedure for addressing symptomatic pes planovalgus foot deformity. For more severe cases, the use of a calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis (CCDA) can allow for more powerful correction. Previous reports have cited an increased risk of graft collapse with loss of correction when this procedure is performed without supplemental hardware fixation. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of CCDA in children with and without supplemental locking fixation. A retrospective review from 2008 to 2016 of CCDA procedures with and without supplemental fixation was performed. The primary endpoint was graft collapse. Secondary objectives included evaluation of radiographic loss of correction, hardware failure, pain at 1-year follow-up, reoperations, and changes in the foot loading pattern foot per pedobarography. Twenty-nine feet in 24 patients were eligible for review. Supplemental locked fixation was used in 18 feet [hardware (HW)], with the remaining 11 feet managed without fixation [no hardware (NoHW)]. The overall failure rate on the basis of graft collapse and loss of correction was 55% (56% for the HW group, 55% for the NoHW group). Eleven patients (61%) in the HW group experienced hardware failure, with six (33%) of these requiring hardware removal. Fifty-six percent of the HW group and 45% of the NoHW group reported continued pain at 1-year follow-up. One patient from each group underwent revision arthrodesis. Supplemental locked fixation did not provide additional benefit in preventing graft collapse and loss of correction in this cohort. Alternative strategies should be considered to improve the outcomes for this procedure.