A Comparison of the Required Bronchial Cuff Volume Obtained by 2 Cuff Inflation Methods, Capnogram Waveform-Guided Versus Pressure-Guided: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. (23rd September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yamada, Yuko; Tanabe, Kumiko; Nagase, Kiyoshi; Ishihara, Takuma; Iida, Hiroki
• Is Part Of: Anesthesia & analgesia. Volume 132:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 827
• Page End: 835
• Publication Date: 2020-09-23
• Subjects: Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; Anesthesia; Anesthesiology; Analgesia; Analgesics; Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; 617.9605
• DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005179
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-2999

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: Double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) are used for one-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracic surgery. Overinflation into the bronchial cuff causes damage to the tracheobronchial mucosa, whereas underinflation leads to an incomplete collapse of the nonventilated lung or incomplete ventilation of the ventilated lung. However, how to determine the appropriate bronchial cuff volume and pressure during OLV is unclear. The objective of this study is to compare the required bronchial cuff volume for lung separation obtained by 2 different cuff inflation methods under closed- and open-chest conditions. METHODS: A total of 64 patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracic surgery requiring OLV were recruited. Left DLTs were used for both right- and left-sided surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 inflation-type groups to estimate the bronchial cuff volume. In the capnogram waveform–guided bronchial cuff inflation group (capno group, n = 27), the bronchial cuff was inflated until a capnometer sampling gas containing CO2 from the nonventilated lung displayed a flat line. The corresponding bronchial cuff volume and pressure were then recorded. In the pressure–guided bronchial cuff inflation group (pressure group, n = 29), the bronchial cuff was inflated by a cuff inflator to a pressure of 20 cm H2 O. Lung separation was confirmed when a flat line of a capnometer was observed after gas sampling from the nonventilated lung. RESULTS: Under closed-chest conditions, the bronchial cuff sealing volume for the capno group was significantly lower than that for the pressure group (mean [standard deviation {SD}], 1.00 [0.65] mL vs 1.44 [0.59] mL, mean difference, −0.44; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], −0.78 to −0.11; P = .010). Under open-chest conditions, the bronchial cuff sealing volume for the capno group was also significantly lower than that for the pressure group (mean [SD], 0.65 [0.66] mL vs 1.22 [0.45] mL, mean difference, −0.58; 97.5% CI, −0.88 to −0.27; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest cuff volume providing an air-tight bronchial seal was obtained by the capnogram waveform–guided bronchial cuff inflation method. Since the cuff volume required to achieve an air-tight seal decreases after opening the chest, readjustment of the bronchial cuff volume to prevent bronchial cuff damage to the tracheobronchial mucosa after opening the chest may be advisable.