Enhanced Home Care Interventions for Community Residing Adults Compared With Usual Care on Health and Cost-effectiveness Outcomes: A Systematic Review. (26th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Flemming, Julie; Armijo-Olivo, Susan; Dennett, Liz; Lapointe, Paul; Robertson, David; Wang, Jian; Ohinmaa, Arto
• Is Part Of: American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. Volume 100:Number 9(2021)
• Page Start: 906
• Page End: 917
• Publication Date: 2021-09-26
• Subjects: Home Care -- Economic Evaluation -- Home Interventions -- Cost-effectiveness; Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Medicine, Physical -- Periodicals; 617.062
• DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001734
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0894-9115

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text. Abstract: The need for home care services is expanding around the world with increased attention to the resources required to produce them. To assist decision making, there is a need to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative programs within home care. Electronic searches were performed in five databases (before February 2020) identifying 3292 potentially relevant studies that assessed new or enhanced home care interventions compared with usual care for adults with an accompanying economic evaluation. From these, 133 articles were selected for full-text screening; 17 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Six main areas of research were identified including the following: alternative nursing care ( n = 4), interdisciplinary care coordination ( n = 4), fall prevention ( n = 4), telemedicine/remote monitoring ( n = 2), restorative/reablement care ( n = 2), and one multifactorial undernutrition intervention study. Risk of bias was found to be high/weak ( n = 7) or have some concerns/moderate ( n = 6) rating, in addition to inconsistent reporting of important information required for economic evaluations. Both health and cost outcomes had mixed results. Cost-effective interventions were found in two areas including alternative nursing care and reablement/restorative care. Clinicians and decision makers are encouraged to carefully evaluate the quality of the studies because of issues with risk of bias and incomplete reporting of economic outcomes.