An intervention to increase physical activity in care home residents: results of a cluster-randomised, controlled feasibility trial (the REACH trial). (23rd July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- An intervention to increase physical activity in care home residents: results of a cluster-randomised, controlled feasibility trial (the REACH trial). (23rd July 2021)
- Main Title:
- An intervention to increase physical activity in care home residents: results of a cluster-randomised, controlled feasibility trial (the REACH trial)
- Authors:
- Forster, Anne
Airlie, Jennifer
Ellwood, Alison
Godfrey, Mary
Green, John
Cundill, Bonnie
Dawkins, Bryony
McMaster, Nicola
Hulme, Claire
Cicero, Robert
McLellan, Vicki
Graham, Liz
Gallagher, Bev
Ellard, David R
Firth, Joan
Farrin, Amanda - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Care home (CH) residents are mainly inactive, leading to increased dependency and low mood. Strategies to improve activity are required. Design and setting: Cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial with embedded process and health economic evaluations. Twelve residential CHs in Yorkshire, United Kingdom, were randomised to the MoveMore intervention plus usual care (UC) ( n = 5) or UC only ( n = 7). Participants: Permanent residents aged ≥65 years. Intervention: MoveMore: a whole home intervention involving all CH staff designed to encourage and support increase in movement of residents. Objectives and measurements: Feasibility objectives relating to recruitment, intervention delivery, data collection and follow-up and safety concerns informed the feasibility of progression to a definitive trial. Data collection at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months included: participants' physical function and mobility, perceived health, mood, quality of life, cognitive impairment questionnaires; accelerometry; safety data; intervention implementation. Results: 300 residents were screened; 153 were registered (62 MoveMore; 91 UC). Average cluster size: MoveMore: 12.4 CHs; UC: 13.0 CHs. There were no CH/resident withdrawals. Forty (26.1%) participants were unavailable for follow-up: 28 died (12 MoveMore; 16 UC); 12 moved from the CH. Staff informant/proxy data collection for participants was >80%; data collection from participants was <75%; at 9 months, 65.6% ofAbstract: Background: Care home (CH) residents are mainly inactive, leading to increased dependency and low mood. Strategies to improve activity are required. Design and setting: Cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial with embedded process and health economic evaluations. Twelve residential CHs in Yorkshire, United Kingdom, were randomised to the MoveMore intervention plus usual care (UC) ( n = 5) or UC only ( n = 7). Participants: Permanent residents aged ≥65 years. Intervention: MoveMore: a whole home intervention involving all CH staff designed to encourage and support increase in movement of residents. Objectives and measurements: Feasibility objectives relating to recruitment, intervention delivery, data collection and follow-up and safety concerns informed the feasibility of progression to a definitive trial. Data collection at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months included: participants' physical function and mobility, perceived health, mood, quality of life, cognitive impairment questionnaires; accelerometry; safety data; intervention implementation. Results: 300 residents were screened; 153 were registered (62 MoveMore; 91 UC). Average cluster size: MoveMore: 12.4 CHs; UC: 13.0 CHs. There were no CH/resident withdrawals. Forty (26.1%) participants were unavailable for follow-up: 28 died (12 MoveMore; 16 UC); 12 moved from the CH. Staff informant/proxy data collection for participants was >80%; data collection from participants was <75%; at 9 months, 65.6% of residents provided valid accelerometer data; two CHs fully, two partially and one failed to implement the intervention. There were no safety concerns. Conclusions: Recruiting CHs and residents was feasible. Intervention implementation and data collection methods need refinement before a definitive trial. There were no safety concerns. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Age and ageing. Volume 50:Number 6(2021)
- Journal:
- Age and ageing
- Issue:
- Volume 50:Number 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0050-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 2063
- Page End:
- 2078
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07-23
- Subjects:
- staff training -- physical activity -- older people -- long-term care -- cluster randomised feasibility trial
Aging -- Periodicals
Geriatrics -- Periodicals
618.97 - Journal URLs:
- http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ageing/afab130 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-0729
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0736.080000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19779.xml