Investigating Hospital Supervision: A Case Study of Regulatory Inspectors' Roles as Potential Co-creators of Resilience. Issue 2 (25th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Øyri, Sina Furnes; Braut, Geir Sverre; Macrae, Carl; Wiig, Siri
• Is Part Of: Journal of patient safety. Volume 17:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 122
• Page End: 130
• Publication Date: 2021-03-25
• Subjects: adaptive capacities -- learning potentials -- regulation -- supervision -- hospitals -- management -- NBHS = Norwegian Board of Health Supervision -- CG = county governor -- The Quality Improvement Regulation = regulation on management and quality improvement in the health care services.; Patients -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Practice -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 610.289
• DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000814
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-8417

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore if, and in what ways, there has been changes in the supervisory approach toward Norwegian hospitals due to the implementation of a new management and quality improvement regulation (Regulation on Management and Quality Improvement in the Healthcare Services, hereinafter referred to as "Quality Improvement Regulation"). Moreover, we aimed to understand how inspectors' work promotes or hampers resilience potentials of adaptive capacity and learning in hospitals. Methods: The study design is a case study of implementation and impact of the Quality Improvement Regulation. We performed a document analysis, and conducted and analyzed 3 focus groups and 2 individual interviews with regulatory inspectors, recruited from 3 county governor offices who are responsible for implementation and supervision of the Quality Improvement Regulation in Norwegian regions. Results: Data analysis resulted in 5 themes. Informants described no substantial change in their approach owing to the Quality Improvement Regulation. Regardless, data pointed to a development in their practices and expectations. Although the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision, at the national level, occasionally provides guidance, supervision is adapted to specific contexts and inspectors balance trade-offs. Informants expressed concern about the impact of supervision on hospital performance. Benefits and disadvantage with positive feedback from inspectors were debated. Inspectors could nurture learning by improving their follow-up and add more hospital self-assessment. Conclusions: A nondetailed regulatory framework such as the Quality Improvement Regulation provides hospitals with room to maneuver, and self-assessment might reduce resource demands. The impact of supervision is scarce with an unfulfilled potential to learn from supervision. The Government could contribute to a shift in focus by instructing the county governors to actively reflect on and communicate positive experiences from, and smart adaptations in, hospital practice.