Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: Immunohistochemical Biomarker Expression and Diagnostic Performance. Issue 3 (1st March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Duggan, Máire A.; Duan, Qiuli; Pfeiffer, Ruth M.; Brett, Mary A.; Lee, Sandra; Köbel, Martin; Sar, Aylin
• Is Part Of: Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology. Volume 29:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 209
• Page End: 217
• Publication Date: 2021-03-01
• Subjects: adenocarcinoma of cervix -- immunohistochemistry -- biomarker expression -- hierarchical clustering -- diagnostic performance; Diagnostic immunohistochemistry -- Periodicals; Immunohistochemistry -- Periodicals; Cells -- Morphology -- Periodicals; Molecular diagnosis -- Periodicals; 616.079
• DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000881
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1541-2016

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Abstract : Immunohistochemistry (IHC) improves the diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma but is not adequately studied. The performance of 16 antibodies previously reported as potentially discriminating between some histotypes was investigated in 184 tumors comprised of 12 histotype groups collapsed into 3 categories [47 adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), 121 probable human papillomavirus–dependent adenocarcinomas (HPVD), and 16 of probable independence (HPVI)]. IHC sections from 5 tissue microarrays were scanned, and 3 pathologists independently reviewed images to assess staining percentages and intensities. Biomarker expression was based on published positive and negative cutoffs and agreement between any 2 pathologists. Differences between the 3 categories in the hierarchical ranking of biomarker positivity were analyzed by Random Forest classification, and between select groups by Unsupervised Hierarchical Clustering. Important category discriminants were combined in logistic regression models and the area under the curve (AUC) computed. Potential group discriminants were terminal cluster biomarkers with a 50% or more difference in positivity. Strong associations occurred between the lower expression of carcinoembryonic antigen and stromal actin in AIS compared with HPVD [AUC=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.80] and in the higher expression of p16 and estrogen receptor in comparison to HPVI (AUC=0.86, 95% CI, 0.73-0.98), and between the higher expression of p16, carcinoembryonic antigen and estrogen receptor in HPVD compared with HPVI (AUC=0.88, 95% CI, 0.77-0.99). Between select groups, 9 biomarkers emerged as potential discriminants. Select IHC biomarkers can discriminate AIS from invasive adenocarcinomas, and invasive adenocarcinomas stratified by human papillomavirus dependency from each other. Independent replication in larger studies is needed, and to confirm discriminants of histotype groups.