16 Quality-adjusted (QA) progression-free survival analyses of veliparib + carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) vs CP alone in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. (13th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 16 Quality-adjusted (QA) progression-free survival analyses of veliparib + carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) vs CP alone in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. (13th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- 16 Quality-adjusted (QA) progression-free survival analyses of veliparib + carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) vs CP alone in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer
- Authors:
- Alvarez Secord, A
Bookman, M
Coleman, R
Dinh, M
Khandelwal, N
Benjamin, K
Kamalakar, R
Sullivan, D
Cella, D - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: Veliparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, was evaluated in a Phase 3 trial (VELIA, NCT02470585 ) among patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV high-grade serous epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. VELIA examined veliparib added to CP followed by veliparib maintenance compared to placebo added to CP followed by placebo maintenance. This analysis compared QA progression-free survival among patients enrolled in VELIA. Methods: Patient-centered outcomes were assessed in 344 Veliparib+ CP and 351 CP alone subjects. Progression-free survival (PFS) time was partitioned into two health states: time with toxicity (Tox) and time without Tox. Tox included three clinically meaningful adverse events (AEs) including nausea, vomiting and fatigue. QA-PFS was assessed for duration of good quality of life, incorporating PFS and health states. Q-TWiST (QA time without disease symptoms or treatment Tox) was calculated as utility-weighted sums of mean health state durations. Sensitivity analyses were conducted utilizing Grade 2+ or Grade 3+ AEs. Similar analyses were conducted on HRD and BRCA-deficient subgroups. Results: A significant difference in mean QA-PFS was seen in favor of Vel throughout compared to CP alone (19.5 months vs 16.5 months; 95% CI 1.42, 4.61; p<0.0001). Mean Q-TWiST was longer for patients in Vel throughout arm compared to CP alone (20.82 months vs 18.06 months; 95% CI 1.09, 4.47; p<0.001). Similar differences inAbstract : Objective: Veliparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, was evaluated in a Phase 3 trial (VELIA, NCT02470585 ) among patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV high-grade serous epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. VELIA examined veliparib added to CP followed by veliparib maintenance compared to placebo added to CP followed by placebo maintenance. This analysis compared QA progression-free survival among patients enrolled in VELIA. Methods: Patient-centered outcomes were assessed in 344 Veliparib+ CP and 351 CP alone subjects. Progression-free survival (PFS) time was partitioned into two health states: time with toxicity (Tox) and time without Tox. Tox included three clinically meaningful adverse events (AEs) including nausea, vomiting and fatigue. QA-PFS was assessed for duration of good quality of life, incorporating PFS and health states. Q-TWiST (QA time without disease symptoms or treatment Tox) was calculated as utility-weighted sums of mean health state durations. Sensitivity analyses were conducted utilizing Grade 2+ or Grade 3+ AEs. Similar analyses were conducted on HRD and BRCA-deficient subgroups. Results: A significant difference in mean QA-PFS was seen in favor of Vel throughout compared to CP alone (19.5 months vs 16.5 months; 95% CI 1.42, 4.61; p<0.0001). Mean Q-TWiST was longer for patients in Vel throughout arm compared to CP alone (20.82 months vs 18.06 months; 95% CI 1.09, 4.47; p<0.001). Similar differences in mean Q-TWiST were observed for sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Conclusion: Compared to CP alone, Veliparib added to CP and continued as maintenance had significant patient-centered benefits in terms of QA-PFS and on-treatment Q-TWiST. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 30(2020)Supplement 3
- Journal:
- International journal of gynecological cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 30(2020)Supplement 3
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0030-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- A12
- Page End:
- A12
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-13
- Subjects:
- Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99465 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ijgc/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118544021/toc ↗
https://ijgc.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/ijgc-2020-IGCS.16 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1048-891X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19786.xml