Goal-Directed Care Using Invasive Neuromonitoring Versus Standard of Care After Cardiac Arrest: A Matched Cohort Study*. Issue 8 (15th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fergusson, Nicholas A.; Hoiland, Ryan L.; Thiara, Sonny; Foster, Denise; Gooderham, Peter; Rikhraj, Kiran; Grunau, Brian; Christenson, Jim; Ainslie, Philip N.; Griesdale, Donald E. G.; Sekhon, Mypinder S.
• Is Part Of: Critical care medicine. Volume 49:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 1333
• Page End: 1346
• Publication Date: 2021-03-15
• Subjects: brain oxygenation -- cardiac arrest -- cerebral oxygen delivery -- hypoxic ischemic brain injury -- neuromonitoring -- secondary injury; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Soins intensifs -- Périodiques; 616.028
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004945
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-3493

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Abstract : PURPOSE: Following return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest, hypoxic ischemic brain injury is the primary cause of mortality and disability. Goal-directed care using invasive multimodal neuromonitoring has emerged as a possible resuscitation strategy. We evaluated whether goal-directed care was associated with improved neurologic outcome in hypoxic ischemic brain injury patients after cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, matched observational cohort study. SETTING: Quaternary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to the ICU following return of spontaneous circulation postcardiac arrest with clinical evidence of hypoxic ischemic brain injury defined as greater than or equal to 10 minutes of cardiac arrest with an unconfounded postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale of less than or equal to 8. INTERVENTIONS: We compared patients who underwent goal-directed care using invasive neuromonitoring with those treated with standard of care (using both total and matched groups). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Goal-directed care patients were matched 1:1 to standard of care patients using propensity scores and exact matching. The primary outcome was a 6-month favorable neurologic outcome (Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2). We included 65 patients, of whom 21 received goal-directed care and 44 patients received standard of care. The median age was 50 (interquartile range, 35–61), 48 (74%) were male, and seven (11%) had shockable rhythms. Favorable neurologic outcome at 6 months was significantly greater in the goal-directed care group ( n = 9/21 [43%]) compared with the matched ( n = 2/21 [10%], p = 0.016) and total ( n = 8/44 [18%], p = 0.034) standard of care groups. Goal-directed care group patients had higher mean arterial pressure ( p < 0.001 vs total; p = 0.0060 vs matched) and lower temperature ( p = 0.007 vs total; p = 0.041 vs matched). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study of patients with hypoxic ischemic brain injury postcardiac arrest, goal-directed care guided by invasive neuromonitoring was associated with a 6-month favorable neurologic outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) versus standard of care. Significant work is required to confirm this finding in a prospectively designed study.