Natural Language Processing Performance for the Identification of Venous Thromboembolism in an Integrated Healthcare System. (27th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Woller, Bela; Daw, Austin; Aston, Valerie; Lloyd, Jim; Snow, Greg; Stevens, Scott M.; Woller, Scott C.; Jones, Peter; Bledsoe, Joseph
• Is Part Of: Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis. Volume 27(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04-27
• Subjects: pulmonary embolism -- PE -- computerized tomography pulmonary angiography -- natural language processing -- NLP -- venous thromboembolic disease -- VTE; Hemostasis -- Periodicals; Thrombosis -- Periodicals; 616.13
• DOI: 10.1177/10760296211013108
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1076-0296

Abstract

Real-time identification of venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), can inform a healthcare organization's understanding of these events and be used to improve care. In a former publication, we reported the performance of an electronic medical record (EMR) interrogation tool that employs natural language processing (NLP) of imaging studies for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Because we transitioned from the legacy electronic medical record to the Cerner product, iCentra, we now report the operating characteristics of the NLP EMR interrogation tool in the new EMR environment. Two hundred randomly selected patient encounters for which the imaging report assessed by NLP that revealed VTE was present were reviewed. These included one hundred imaging studies for which PE was identified. These included computed tomography pulmonary angiography—CTPA, ventilation perfusion—V/Q scan, and CT angiography of the chest/ abdomen/pelvis. One hundred randomly selected comprehensive ultrasound (CUS) that identified DVT were also obtained. For comparison, one hundred patient encounters in which PE was suspected and imaging was negative for PE (CTPA or V/Q) and 100 cases of suspected DVT with negative CUS as reported by NLP were also selected. Manual chart review of the 400 charts was performed and we report the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of NLP compared with manual chart review. NLP and manual review agreed on the presence of PE in 99 of 100 cases, the presence of DVT in 96 of 100 cases, the absence of PE in 99 of 100 cases and the absence of DVT in all 100 cases. When compared with manual chart review, NLP interrogation of CUS, CTPA, CT angiography of the chest, and V/Q scan yielded a sensitivity = 93.3%, specificity = 99.6%, positive predictive value = 97.1%, and negative predictive value = 99%.